From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
chenxiang <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Balance initial LPI affinity across CPUs
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 17:57:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200515165752.121296-3-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200515165752.121296-1-maz@kernel.org>
When mapping a LPI, the ITS driver picks the first possible
affinity, which is in most cases CPU0, assuming that if
that's not suitable, someone will come and set the affinity
to something more interesting.
It apparently isn't the case, and people complain of poor
performance when many interrupts are glued to the same CPU.
So let's place the interrupts by finding the "least loaded"
CPU (that is, the one that has the fewer LPIs mapped to it).
So called 'managed' interrupts are an interesting case where
the affinity is actually dictated by the kernel itself, and
we should honor this.
Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1575642904-58295-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 4eb8441d0c2b..2aaf1e6bdc89 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -1541,15 +1541,104 @@ static void its_dec_lpi_count(struct irq_data *d, int cpu)
atomic_dec(&per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_lpi_count, cpu)->unmanaged);
}
+static unsigned int cpumask_pick_least_loaded(struct irq_data *d,
+ const struct cpumask *cpu_mask)
+{
+ unsigned int cpu = nr_cpu_ids, tmp;
+ int count = S32_MAX;
+
+ for_each_cpu(tmp, cpu_mask) {
+ int this_count = its_read_lpi_count(d, tmp);
+ if (this_count < count) {
+ cpu = tmp;
+ count = this_count;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return cpu;
+}
+
+/*
+ * As suggested by Thomas Gleixner in:
+ * https://lore.kernel.org/r/87h80q2aoc.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
+ */
+static int its_select_cpu(struct irq_data *d,
+ const struct cpumask *aff_mask)
+{
+ struct its_device *its_dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ cpumask_var_t tmpmask;
+ int cpu, node;
+
+ if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&tmpmask, GFP_KERNEL))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ node = its_dev->its->numa_node;
+
+ if (!irqd_affinity_is_managed(d)) {
+ /* First try the NUMA node */
+ if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
+ /*
+ * Try the intersection of the affinity mask and the
+ * node mask (and the online mask, just to be safe).
+ */
+ cpumask_and(tmpmask, cpumask_of_node(node), aff_mask);
+ cpumask_and(tmpmask, tmpmask, cpu_online_mask);
+
+ /*
+ * Ideally, we would check if the mask is empty, and
+ * try again on the full node here.
+ *
+ * But it turns out that the way API describes the
+ * affinity for ITSs only deals about memory, and
+ * not target CPUs, so it cannot describe a single
+ * ITS placed next to two NUMA nodes.
+ *
+ * Instead, just fallback on the online mask. This
+ * diverges from Thomas' suggestion above.
+ */
+ cpu = cpumask_pick_least_loaded(d, tmpmask);
+ if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+ goto out;
+
+ /* If we can't cross sockets, give up */
+ if ((its_dev->its->flags & ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23144))
+ goto out;
+
+ /* If the above failed, expand the search */
+ }
+
+ /* Try the intersection of the affinity and online masks */
+ cpumask_and(tmpmask, aff_mask, cpu_online_mask);
+
+ /* If that doesn't fly, the online mask is the last resort */
+ if (cpumask_empty(tmpmask))
+ cpumask_copy(tmpmask, cpu_online_mask);
+
+ cpu = cpumask_pick_least_loaded(d, tmpmask);
+ } else {
+ cpumask_and(tmpmask, irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d), cpu_online_mask);
+
+ /* If we cannot cross sockets, limit the search to that node */
+ if ((its_dev->its->flags & ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23144) &&
+ node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
+ cpumask_and(tmpmask, tmpmask, cpumask_of_node(node));
+
+ cpu = cpumask_pick_least_loaded(d, tmpmask);
+ }
+out:
+ free_cpumask_var(tmpmask);
+
+ pr_debug("IRQ%d -> %*pbl CPU%d\n", d->irq, cpumask_pr_args(aff_mask), cpu);
+ return cpu;
+}
+
static int its_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
bool force)
{
- unsigned int cpu;
- const struct cpumask *cpu_mask = cpu_online_mask;
struct its_device *its_dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct its_collection *target_col;
u32 id = its_get_event_id(d);
- int prev_cpu;
+ int cpu, prev_cpu;
/* A forwarded interrupt should use irq_set_vcpu_affinity */
if (irqd_is_forwarded_to_vcpu(d))
@@ -1558,18 +1647,12 @@ static int its_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
prev_cpu = its_dev->event_map.col_map[id];
its_dec_lpi_count(d, prev_cpu);
- /* lpi cannot be routed to a redistributor that is on a foreign node */
- if (its_dev->its->flags & ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23144) {
- if (its_dev->its->numa_node >= 0) {
- cpu_mask = cpumask_of_node(its_dev->its->numa_node);
- if (!cpumask_intersects(mask_val, cpu_mask))
- goto err;
- }
- }
-
- cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_mask);
+ if (!force)
+ cpu = its_select_cpu(d, mask_val);
+ else
+ cpu = cpumask_pick_least_loaded(d, mask_val);
- if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
goto err;
/* don't set the affinity when the target cpu is same as current one */
@@ -3473,21 +3556,11 @@ static int its_irq_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
{
struct its_device *its_dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
u32 event = its_get_event_id(d);
- const struct cpumask *cpu_mask = cpu_online_mask;
int cpu;
- /* get the cpu_mask of local node */
- if (its_dev->its->numa_node >= 0)
- cpu_mask = cpumask_of_node(its_dev->its->numa_node);
-
- /* Bind the LPI to the first possible CPU */
- cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpu_mask, cpu_online_mask);
- if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
- if (its_dev->its->flags & ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23144)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
- }
+ cpu = its_select_cpu(d, cpu_online_mask);
+ if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ return -EINVAL;
its_inc_lpi_count(d, cpu);
its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpu;
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-15 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-15 16:57 [PATCH v4 0/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Balance LPI affinity across CPUs Marc Zyngier
2020-05-15 16:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Track LPI distribution on a per CPU basis Marc Zyngier
2020-05-15 16:57 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-05-15 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Balance LPI affinity across CPUs John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200515165752.121296-3-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).