From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0D8C433DF for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 22:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74B9620715 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 22:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="rBqal8YU"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="nAVHFKWU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 74B9620715 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RqYsF5kKA9gVO9K69Jq+YDPj11c2fRfGCy7+kdA4kIg=; b=rBqal8YUv3FQVi l6pDgHgCj2j8W9vSkjXjVE6kPXvPmRfB3LfTVYIz6u870UGeMif7DQVo2YbWwi2MGtVK+cJXBes/E y+MnZ7/KF0pAYPybjxaucCdvFHLsCR8oV+Fg64RPZe7VNjc0eWl5atgG+QdLMx5m7kq5cEbdVACHP y6wA0yweqwDvnCL/QavyoHHKufk31aS7C5aF92h+4GRQRfdnXTyM/DiMUIbzeoACWQkjiadD6oOkw Xe7+GOm+lt2thOCLZaQWlyo4+TNV2iCM+EMsXZqNB60msbyNLLbgcCRHJJPviIug25Ziv7v7HbRJV rBPa8c00F4VyLbD0IIwg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jaoNe-000894-1D; Mon, 18 May 2020 22:37:06 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jaoNY-00088M-NP for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 22:37:04 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id u35so5488142pgk.6 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:37:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=X67f6N/TB7/lmzTe8rOyg+PekxRmdn/lrnG7IaiK4Ik=; b=nAVHFKWUbfBnlT6fSExrrp8Vwi0yApBLMl38HX8egS5c7xDNaQkhsaHsv8k/yLhoNK onEufHENr57Vb2Uv85JpMb+nJYWovbjbOn0s3z+klub5Etn641hjl1/0hUqm0325p9Sc pfxfQ0dohgF8+3FM03a4I1ZA0X9JzNvf7n8y//ExsRPJfQZ7lrOCEEtH4jmOnK3rq6oJ y82T0aXWdXmYL6FmBkV1xP0fWZfKc6QTP9CY9pL0eyTSHdyQ5vVH80/3mj2xmh/v4om8 3+4uuztUrJRSnYX9hs3BIw6/GkH1fUJAAYrM40cGgIGPAe0BePeZPPNb6w4GUvVAE8fw Gj9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=X67f6N/TB7/lmzTe8rOyg+PekxRmdn/lrnG7IaiK4Ik=; b=VKkcqS2NILC5ZpfAo6ZmL6gjuFkNxmvJ4LFJj/JUDI0+W7tjGFS6JALwOYF6B6mrNv qs2Eq0piu/s/TvoqlFGyNGSlOF+CIQA5UCrqdkgvOf0hTziRQSxbQvez4aBz5GchLpry dFmyTPjkwHJ8BJvyodXDlzaeFXrE5YtlAKyq8KvdxvLJ9FpHqt13f4t8qqp5R9MBkIMG hpw3jRO7zf5aPCxCl+NV+sGRUyzdyw/48XFW56poL4lLD0qTBnn7UkWVO9CzQF4Jwb3F oG9v7Q3oPaop9cpz+R58tWAIFWW7M17HKY9LJh1zKWHE8rbrhKCUl88jJYjDCwhPVvWN SxhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gOus2VDdJD56y4kawlo2L+kFgLWMf4rm7KqGal36rTYZT/msK c/xRw9OFPCBpdNBG0JbRfbarhQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxmRJRzjqlDQUZoLrEMr+A2g4VH7fKXkn6ymAdxYa5w9ZqWt3+q0XntcXhA1ZpW3IBQp3MLQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:77c6:: with SMTP id s189mr16717156pgc.267.1589841419904; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder.lan (104-188-17-28.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [104.188.17.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o190sm9600752pfb.178.2020.05.18.15.36.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 May 2020 15:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 15:35:36 -0700 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Sai Prakash Ranjan Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Support ETMv4 power management Message-ID: <20200518223536.GJ2165@builder.lan> References: <56a5563205da61c47eb4f8bbf6120e28@codeaurora.org> <20200518185124.GG2165@builder.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200518_153700_802293_7CDE8C9F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.28 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Poirier , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Stephen Boyd , Andy Gross , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mike Leach Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon 18 May 12:08 PDT 2020, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > On 2020-05-19 00:21, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Fri 15 May 03:55 PDT 2020, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > The previous version of this patch in QCOM tree seems to have added > > > the > > > property to replicator node instead of etm7 node, can you please drop > > > that from the tree and apply this one? > > > > > > > I'm not able to replace the old commit without rewriting the history of > > the branch. So I've applied a patch ontop of the branch to fix this up > > instead. > > > > Please review the branch and let me know if there's any issues. > > > > Thanks for the patch, I checked the branch and its good. > Sorry, I should have sent a patch on top of the old one > instead of repost. > No worries, now you know for next time. Thanks confirming my fix. Thanks, Bjorn _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel