public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Jiping Ma <jiping.ma2@windriver.com>
Cc: zhe.he@windriver.com, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com,
	yue.tao@windriver.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V3] arm64: perf: Get the wrong PC value in REGS_ABI_32 mode
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 11:26:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526102611.GA1363@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589165527-188401-1-git-send-email-jiping.ma2@windriver.com>

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:52:07AM +0800, Jiping Ma wrote:
> Modified the patch subject and the change description.
> 
> PC value is get from regs[15] in REGS_ABI_32 mode, but correct PC
> is regs->pc(regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_PC]) in arm64 kernel, which caused
> that perf can not parser the backtrace of app with dwarf mode in the 
> 32bit system and 64bit kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiping Ma <jiping.ma2@windriver.com>

Thanks for this.


> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
> index 0bbac61..0ef2880 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
>  	if ((u32)idx == PERF_REG_ARM64_PC)
>  		return regs->pc;
>  
> +	if (perf_reg_abi(current) == PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32
> +		&& idx == 15)
> +		return regs->pc;

I think there are some more issues here, and we may need a more
substantial rework. For a compat thread, we always expose
PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32 via per_reg_abi(), but for some reason
perf_reg_value() also munges the compat SP/LR into their ARM64
equivalents, which don't exist in the 32-bit sample ABI. We also don't
zero the regs that don't exist in 32-bit (including the aliasing PC).

I reckon what we should do is have seperate functions for the two ABIs,
to ensure we don't conflate them, e.g.

u64 perf_reg_value_abi32(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
	if ((u32)idx > PERF_REG_ARM32_PC)
		return 0;
	if (idx == PERF_REG_ARM32_PC)
		return regs->pc;
	
	/*
	 * Compat SP and LR already in-place
	 */
	return regs->regs[idx];
}

u64 perf_reg_value_abi64(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
	if ((u32)idx > PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX)
		return 0;
	if ((u32)idx == PERF_REG_ARM64_SP)
		return regs->sp;
	if ((u32)idx == PERF_REG_ARM64_PC)
		return regs->pc;
	
	reutrn regs->regs[idx];
}

u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
	if (compat_user_mode(regs))
		return perf_reg_value_abi32(regs, idx);
	else
		return perf_reg_value_abi64(regs, idx);
}

Thanks,
Mark.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1589165527-188401-1-git-send-email-jiping.ma2@windriver.com>
2020-05-26  2:46 ` [PATCH][V3] arm64: perf: Get the wrong PC value in REGS_ABI_32 mode Jiping Ma
2020-05-26 10:26 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2020-05-26 19:54   ` Will Deacon
2020-05-27  1:30     ` Jiping Ma
2020-05-27 15:03     ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27  1:33   ` Jiping Ma
2020-05-27 15:19     ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-28  1:06       ` Jiping Ma
2020-05-28  7:54         ` Will Deacon
2020-05-29  5:57           ` Jiping Ma
2020-06-18 13:03           ` Mark Rutland
2020-06-23 17:19             ` Will Deacon
2020-06-23 17:44               ` Will Deacon
2020-06-25 12:54                 ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526102611.GA1363@C02TD0UTHF1T.local \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.ashfield@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jiping.ma2@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yue.tao@windriver.com \
    --cc=zhe.he@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox