From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0558AC433DF for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58A920899 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="FWFcnwV8"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="rED9Tc5F" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C58A920899 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=wVpipR/w7uhs7M1IYwsvN5e6SX0iVnik8iRpnFhPmgo=; b=FWFcnwV82h8Y/2 UwCkNrm8p47TlAeFsdxMYiqsTbkTFMKbyJSh1HsKzMybRvaCzpNARXSb1thAN+X3omQSEDy/NuGaq 3s9/ThnAAgrHnix9kZHNpIdsLkHTkH/DA4qYW4nssyaNIjVbz6j3DfIkGELjH3l7lCAeaf6j+3fyu bTLbZX1f5YbjqUplRK/E84tduQOsyVOgWw7x0mY2zkGn2uesWNC7gvGHwoyF8GS0UqjY054Of5bVs knE+R28dEkNFBOQ5G20gi5W4jgV1IVcJF/xgp31YMKpG51M2+N8CGMUOxwnOdBzeSs5kLf4UO8Ut3 A4Up/pjfZGQ+DOuSRU4g==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jdXbF-00075Y-Sa; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:18:25 +0000 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jdXbC-000753-FA for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:18:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6lrYl9/AU8kf7BRAZiJ/WNqQg6FKld5XALj2ECqgZuw=; b=rED9Tc5F37lwlh299LaxhwxP2 gYlULzxMgyNUKMLcKieq642d/0UJYHt0TDwOoOzC8bHgaSBbUACgTqS3xKFSQqo56krETi0ecku7m rMWXbiaXAAaKWLYgWp88x9YrPcnRS3/AJEkaZIsxWnmo/P3zRaIW9z8shm+2CEvWa3EhC4+ZJ3h4F /T875qRa0uHpQM60MkHtZNSpsT6jjl2f3Eyq1s5g6trDMglKrmlWZy8vI8gaRlGWHToXSBbyHjqRf Bl5Yr/yHN75kUzxOPltfQfNqWV43WpoQ5Ln/yUVyRgNLyJUlIZoZ136vQcrM0WeXaBMV5t29em6zh 84V0aL79g==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:34742) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdXax-0007ec-OX; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:18:07 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jdXau-0005KU-Ur; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:18:04 +0100 Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 12:18:04 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: Allow either FLATMEM or SPARSEMEM on the multiplatform build Message-ID: <20200526111804.GW1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20200521081825.1348844-1-rppt@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200521081825.1348844-1-rppt@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200526_041822_505055_F0B45D02 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.21 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Florian Fainelli , Arnd Bergmann , Stephen Boyd , Kevin Cernekee , Doug Berger , Gregory Fong , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:18:23AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > (resendig for the correct address and with mailing list cc'ed, sorry for > the noise) There are two patches in the patch system, submitted within minutes of each other, with the same summary "Allow either FLATMEM or SPARSEMEM on the multiplatform build" but the patch and commit messages are different. I guess the summary for one of the patches is wrong? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel