From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EE8C433E0 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 150CE20704 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="WlCY7buo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 150CE20704 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baikalelectronics.ru Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=P+EHH7K8aFZtrzJ8wYW71DaHHmTjms63JcTXyMNFLv8=; b=WlCY7buosWPtYQ w/2mAXBnF5PpPuonJXBn7qVASbJe70NDavCbXEpWFn0+k6dNDHXpW34/WAaDp+gHiw9/o/Nbxty0t AGb1+dnaREdXUqJzQWIl8RN2Upzu+Pt1X5Us1rGNixPPqBcvYf415YHyFm37Sb7IlpWWkpirrZJBA j9WvQMQ+5wDWPN3H6fTD1TGdVYhe5fC/7EPyLR3Z5F3jip4J3fRkmt6osNYKrhwuocPDmRdhX7gLq CB3LFTbLfxII42QcePe0SEzsOJnj+4dGPupwrsepRYzy+z9XHVygkLDs480JQJb4U+FLByX+IoWPE NM8IdbYjQwhB2g3li+4A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jddaQ-0006PN-1A; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:41:58 +0000 Received: from mail.baikalelectronics.com ([87.245.175.226] helo=mail.baikalelectronics.ru) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jddaM-0006Nz-HB for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:41:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.baikalelectronics.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44395803086B; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:41:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at baikalelectronics.ru Received: from mail.baikalelectronics.ru ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.baikalelectronics.ru [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hZUm0VjOyTcJ; Tue, 26 May 2020 20:41:50 +0300 (MSK) Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 20:41:49 +0300 From: Serge Semin To: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] serial: 8250_dw: Fix common clocks usage race condition Message-ID: <20200526174149.wpmto6vx775idbaj@mobilestation> References: <20200526160316.26136-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20200526160316.26136-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20200526165701.GX1634618@smile.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200526165701.GX1634618@smile.fi.intel.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: MAIL.baikal.int (192.168.51.25) To mail (192.168.51.25) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200526_104154_938107_128B8895 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.37 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Russell King , Serge Semin , Alexey Malahov , Maxime Ripard , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 07:57:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 07:03:16PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > The race condition may happen if the UART reference clock is shared with > > some other device (on Baikal-T1 SoC it's another DW UART port). In this > > case if that device changes the clock rate while serial console is using > > it the DW 8250 UART port might not only end up with an invalid uartclk > > value saved, but may also experience a distorted output data since > > baud-clock could have been changed. In order to fix this lets at least > > try to adjust the 8250 port setting like UART clock rate in case if the > > reference clock rate change is discovered. The driver will call the new > > method to update 8250 UART port clock rate settings. It's done by means of > > the clock event notifier registered at the port startup and unregistered > > in the shutdown callback method. > > > > Note 1. In order to avoid deadlocks we had to execute the UART port update > > method in a dedicated deferred work. This is due to (in my opinion > > redundant) the clock update implemented in the dw8250_set_termios() > > method. > > Note 2. Before the ref clock is manually changed by the custom > > set_termios() function we swap the port uartclk value with new rate > > adjusted to be suitable for the requested baud. It is necessary in > > order to effectively disable a functionality of the ref clock events > > handler for the current UART port, since uartclk update will be done > > a bit further in the generic serial8250_do_set_termios() function. > > ... > > > +static void dw8250_clk_work_cb(struct work_struct *work) > > +{ > > + struct dw8250_data *d = work_to_dw8250_data(work); > > + struct uart_8250_port *up; > > + unsigned long rate; > > + > > + rate = clk_get_rate(d->clk); > > > + if (rate) { > > if (rate <= 0) > return; > > ? Ok. Though there isn't point in a function consisting of a few lines. > > > + up = serial8250_get_port(d->data.line); > > + > > + serial8250_update_uartclk(&up->port, rate); > > + } > > +} > > ... > > > +static int dw8250_startup(struct uart_port *p) > > +{ > > + struct dw8250_data *d = to_dw8250_data(p->private_data); > > + int ret; > > + > > + /* > > + * Some platforms may provide a reference clock shared between several > > + * devices. In this case before using the serial port first we have to > > + * make sure that any clock state change is known to the UART port at > > + * least post factum. > > + */ > > > + if (d->clk) { > > Do you need this? Yes, I do. The same way as clk_get_rate() needs this. > > > + ret = clk_notifier_register(d->clk, &d->clk_notifier); > > Okay, seems clk_notifier_register() and its counterpart should be fixed for > optional clocks. In order to use the clk_get_rate() function we need to make sure the clk isn't optional otherwise -EINVAL will be returned, which is indistinguishable from any another error. The same situation is for the clk_notifier_register() and clk_notifier_unregister() counterpart. > > > + if (ret) > > + dev_warn(p->dev, "Failed to set the clock notifier\n"); > > So, what does this warning mean on the platforms which does not need notifier > at all It means "The clk-notifier subsystem is broken. Though if reference clock rate doesn't change, it won't a problem." Due to the last statement we print a warning, but not an error message. > (i.o.w. all but baikal)? No. As we discussed earlier in the previous pacthset versions there are another platforms with shared reference clocks behind the DW APB UART, like: Allwinner SoCs, RPi 3/4, etc. > > > + /* > > + * Get current reference clock rate to make sure the UART port > > + * is equipped with an up-to-date value before it's started up. > > + */ > > Why? We call ->set_termios() for it, no? This makes sense. Thanks. I'll remove this part. -Sergey > > > + p->uartclk = clk_get_rate(d->clk); > > + if (!p->uartclk) { > > + dev_err(p->dev, "Clock rate not defined\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + return serial8250_do_startup(p); > > +} > > + > > +static void dw8250_shutdown(struct uart_port *p) > > +{ > > + struct dw8250_data *d = to_dw8250_data(p->private_data); > > + > > + serial8250_do_shutdown(p); > > + > > > + if (d->clk) { > > Ditto. > > > + clk_notifier_unregister(d->clk, &d->clk_notifier); > > + > > + flush_work(&d->clk_work); > > + } > > +} > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel