Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: bcm2835: Fix return type of bcm2835_register_gate

[Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>]

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 04:42:04PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Nathan Chancellor (2020-05-16 01:08:06)
> > bcm2835_register_gate is used as a callback for the clk_register member
> > of bcm2835_clk_desc, which expects a struct clk_hw * return type but
> > bcm2835_register_gate returns a struct clk *.
> > 
> > This discrepancy is hidden by the fact that bcm2835_register_gate is
> > cast to the typedef bcm2835_clk_register by the _REGISTER macro. This
> > turns out to be a control flow integrity violation, which is how this
> > was noticed.
> > 
> > Change the return type of bcm2835_register_gate to be struct clk_hw *
> > and use clk_hw_register_gate to do so. This should be a non-functional
> > change as clk_register_gate calls clk_hw_register_gate anyways but this
> > is needed to avoid issues with further changes.
> > 
> > Fixes: b19f009d4510 ("clk: bcm2835: Migrate to clk_hw based registration and OF APIs")
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1028
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> > ---
> 
> Thanks. Applied to clk-next.
> 
> > 
> > base-commit: bdecf38f228bcca73b31ada98b5b7ba1215eb9c9
> 
> Please don't base on some random linux-next commit though.

Sorry, should have just used clk-next directly instead of the HEAD of
linux-next at the time. Just hard to keep track of all of the different
maintainer trees so it is easier to just use linux-next.

I do forget to use the output of --scm from
get_maintainer.pl though, I should use that more often.

Thank you for picking it up!

Nathan

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel