From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>,
Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: notify@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Exclude alloca() from the instrumentation logic
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:49:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200604134957.505389-2-alex.popov@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200604134957.505389-1-alex.popov@linux.com>
Some time ago Variable Length Arrays (VLA) were removed from the kernel.
The kernel is built with '-Wvla'. Let's exclude alloca() from the
instrumentation logic and make it simpler. The build-time assertion
against alloca() is added instead.
Unfortunately, for that assertion we can't simply check cfun->calls_alloca
during RTL phase. It turned out that gcc before version 7 called
allocate_dynamic_stack_space() from expand_stack_vars() for runtime
alignment of constant-sized stack variables. That caused cfun->calls_alloca
to be set for functions that don't use alloca().
Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
---
scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c | 51 +++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c b/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c
index cc75eeba0be1..1ecfe50d0bf5 100644
--- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c
+++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c
@@ -9,10 +9,9 @@
* any of the gcc libraries
*
* This gcc plugin is needed for tracking the lowest border of the kernel stack.
- * It instruments the kernel code inserting stackleak_track_stack() calls:
- * - after alloca();
- * - for the functions with a stack frame size greater than or equal
- * to the "track-min-size" plugin parameter.
+ * It instruments the kernel code inserting stackleak_track_stack() calls
+ * for the functions with a stack frame size greater than or equal to
+ * the "track-min-size" plugin parameter.
*
* This plugin is ported from grsecurity/PaX. For more information see:
* https://grsecurity.net/
@@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ static struct plugin_info stackleak_plugin_info = {
"disable\t\tdo not activate the plugin\n"
};
-static void stackleak_add_track_stack(gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, bool after)
+static void stackleak_add_track_stack(gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
{
gimple stmt;
gcall *stackleak_track_stack;
@@ -56,12 +55,7 @@ static void stackleak_add_track_stack(gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, bool after)
/* Insert call to void stackleak_track_stack(void) */
stmt = gimple_build_call(track_function_decl, 0);
stackleak_track_stack = as_a_gcall(stmt);
- if (after) {
- gsi_insert_after(gsi, stackleak_track_stack,
- GSI_CONTINUE_LINKING);
- } else {
- gsi_insert_before(gsi, stackleak_track_stack, GSI_SAME_STMT);
- }
+ gsi_insert_before(gsi, stackleak_track_stack, GSI_SAME_STMT);
/* Update the cgraph */
bb = gimple_bb(stackleak_track_stack);
@@ -87,14 +81,13 @@ static bool is_alloca(gimple stmt)
/*
* Work with the GIMPLE representation of the code. Insert the
- * stackleak_track_stack() call after alloca() and into the beginning
- * of the function if it is not instrumented.
+ * stackleak_track_stack() call into the beginning of the function.
*/
static unsigned int stackleak_instrument_execute(void)
{
basic_block bb, entry_bb;
- bool prologue_instrumented = false, is_leaf = true;
- gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
+ bool is_leaf = true;
+ gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = { 0 };
/*
* ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR is a basic block which represents possible entry
@@ -111,27 +104,17 @@ static unsigned int stackleak_instrument_execute(void)
*/
FOR_EACH_BB_FN(bb, cfun) {
for (gsi = gsi_start_bb(bb); !gsi_end_p(gsi); gsi_next(&gsi)) {
- gimple stmt;
-
- stmt = gsi_stmt(gsi);
+ gimple stmt = gsi_stmt(gsi);
/* Leaf function is a function which makes no calls */
if (is_gimple_call(stmt))
is_leaf = false;
- if (!is_alloca(stmt))
- continue;
-
- /* Insert stackleak_track_stack() call after alloca() */
- stackleak_add_track_stack(&gsi, true);
- if (bb == entry_bb)
- prologue_instrumented = true;
+ /* Variable Length Arrays are forbidden in the kernel */
+ gcc_assert(!is_alloca(stmt));
}
}
- if (prologue_instrumented)
- return 0;
-
/*
* Special cases to skip the instrumentation.
*
@@ -168,7 +151,7 @@ static unsigned int stackleak_instrument_execute(void)
bb = single_succ(ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN(cfun));
}
gsi = gsi_after_labels(bb);
- stackleak_add_track_stack(&gsi, false);
+ stackleak_add_track_stack(&gsi);
return 0;
}
@@ -185,12 +168,20 @@ static bool large_stack_frame(void)
/*
* Work with the RTL representation of the code.
* Remove the unneeded stackleak_track_stack() calls from the functions
- * which don't call alloca() and don't have a large enough stack frame size.
+ * that don't have a large enough stack frame size.
*/
static unsigned int stackleak_cleanup_execute(void)
{
rtx_insn *insn, *next;
+ /*
+ * gcc before version 7 called allocate_dynamic_stack_space() from
+ * expand_stack_vars() for runtime alignment of constant-sized stack
+ * variables. That caused cfun->calls_alloca to be set for functions
+ * that don't use alloca().
+ * For more info see gcc commit 7072df0aae0c59ae437e.
+ * Let's leave such functions instrumented.
+ */
if (cfun->calls_alloca)
return 0;
--
2.25.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-04 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-04 13:49 [PATCH 0/5] Improvements of the stackleak gcc plugin Alexander Popov
2020-06-04 13:49 ` Alexander Popov [this message]
2020-06-04 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Exclude alloca() from the instrumentation logic Jann Horn
2020-06-04 15:23 ` Alexander Popov
2020-06-09 18:39 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-10 15:24 ` Alexander Popov
2020-06-04 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Use asm instrumentation to avoid useless register saving Alexander Popov
2020-06-04 15:05 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-09 18:46 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-10 15:47 ` Alexander Popov
2020-06-10 20:03 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-11 23:45 ` Alexander Popov
2020-06-04 13:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Add 'verbose' plugin parameter Alexander Popov
2020-06-09 18:47 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-10 15:52 ` Alexander Popov
2020-06-10 20:04 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 13:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Don't instrument itself Alexander Popov
2020-06-09 18:48 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 13:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Don't instrument vgettimeofday.c in arm64 VDSO Alexander Popov
2020-06-04 13:58 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-04 14:14 ` Jann Horn
2020-06-04 14:20 ` Alexander Popov
2020-06-04 14:25 ` Jann Horn
2020-06-04 14:44 ` Alexander Popov
2020-06-09 19:09 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-10 7:30 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-10 15:18 ` Alexander Popov
2020-06-04 21:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] Improvements of the stackleak gcc plugin Kees Cook
2020-06-09 19:15 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-10 15:14 ` Alexander Popov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200604134957.505389-2-alex.popov@linux.com \
--to=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=notify@kernel.org \
--cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
--cc=spender@grsecurity.net \
--cc=svens@stackframe.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=yzaikin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).