* [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: Save the host's PtrAuth keys in non-preemptible context
2020-06-10 11:34 [PATCH v2 0/4] kvm: arm64: Pointer Authentication handling fixes Marc Zyngier
@ 2020-06-10 11:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-10 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: Handle PtrAuth traps early Marc Zyngier
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2020-06-10 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Mark Rutland, kernel-team, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
stable, James Morse, Andrew Scull, Will Deacon, Julien Thierry
When using the PtrAuth feature in a guest, we need to save the host's
keys before allowing the guest to program them. For that, we dump
them in a per-CPU data structure (the so called host context).
But both call sites that do this are in preemptible context,
which may end up in disaster should the vcpu thread get preempted
before reentering the guest.
Instead, save the keys eagerly on each vcpu_load(). This has an
increased overhead, but is at least safe.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 6 ------
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 19 ++-----------------
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index a30b4eec7cb4..977843e4d5fb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -112,12 +112,6 @@ static inline void vcpu_ptrauth_disable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 &= ~(HCR_API | HCR_APK);
}
-static inline void vcpu_ptrauth_setup_lazy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- if (vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
- vcpu_ptrauth_disable(vcpu);
-}
-
static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return vcpu->arch.vsesr_el2;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index d6988401c22a..152049c5055d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -337,6 +337,12 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
preempt_enable();
}
+#define __ptrauth_save_key(regs, key) \
+({ \
+ regs[key ## KEYLO_EL1] = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ ## key ## KEYLO_EL1); \
+ regs[key ## KEYHI_EL1] = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ ## key ## KEYHI_EL1); \
+})
+
void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
{
int *last_ran;
@@ -370,7 +376,17 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
else
vcpu_set_wfx_traps(vcpu);
- vcpu_ptrauth_setup_lazy(vcpu);
+ if (vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
+ struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt = vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context;
+
+ __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APIA);
+ __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APIB);
+ __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APDA);
+ __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APDB);
+ __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APGA);
+
+ vcpu_ptrauth_disable(vcpu);
+ }
}
void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index eb194696ef62..065251efa2e6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -162,31 +162,16 @@ static int handle_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
return 1;
}
-#define __ptrauth_save_key(regs, key) \
-({ \
- regs[key ## KEYLO_EL1] = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ ## key ## KEYLO_EL1); \
- regs[key ## KEYHI_EL1] = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ ## key ## KEYHI_EL1); \
-})
-
/*
* Handle the guest trying to use a ptrauth instruction, or trying to access a
* ptrauth register.
*/
void kvm_arm_vcpu_ptrauth_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt;
-
- if (vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
+ if (vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
vcpu_ptrauth_enable(vcpu);
- ctxt = vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context;
- __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APIA);
- __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APIB);
- __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APDA);
- __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APDB);
- __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APGA);
- } else {
+ else
kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
- }
}
/*
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: Handle PtrAuth traps early
2020-06-10 11:34 [PATCH v2 0/4] kvm: arm64: Pointer Authentication handling fixes Marc Zyngier
2020-06-10 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: Save the host's PtrAuth keys in non-preemptible context Marc Zyngier
@ 2020-06-10 11:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-10 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: Stop sparse from moaning at __hyp_this_cpu_ptr Marc Zyngier
2020-06-10 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: Remove host_cpu_context member from vcpu structure Marc Zyngier
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2020-06-10 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Mark Rutland, kernel-team, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
James Morse, Andrew Scull, Will Deacon, Julien Thierry
The current way we deal with PtrAuth is a bit heavy handed:
- We forcefully save the host's keys on each vcpu_load()
- Handling the PtrAuth trap forces us to go all the way back
to the exit handling code to just set the HCR bits
Overall, this is pretty cumbersome. A better approach would be
to handle it the same way we deal with the FPSIMD registers:
- On vcpu_load() disable PtrAuth for the guest
- On first use, save the host's keys, enable PtrAuth in the
guest
Crucially, this can happen as a fixup, which is done very early
on exit. We can then reenter the guest immediately without
leaving the hypervisor role.
Another thing is that it simplify the rest of the host handling:
exiting all the way to the host means that the only possible
outcome for this trap is to inject an UNDEF.
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 17 +---------
arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 17 ++--------
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 13 +++-----
4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 152049c5055d..14b747266607 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -337,12 +337,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
preempt_enable();
}
-#define __ptrauth_save_key(regs, key) \
-({ \
- regs[key ## KEYLO_EL1] = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ ## key ## KEYLO_EL1); \
- regs[key ## KEYHI_EL1] = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ ## key ## KEYHI_EL1); \
-})
-
void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
{
int *last_ran;
@@ -376,17 +370,8 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
else
vcpu_set_wfx_traps(vcpu);
- if (vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
- struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt = vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context;
-
- __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APIA);
- __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APIB);
- __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APDA);
- __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APDB);
- __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APGA);
-
+ if (vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
vcpu_ptrauth_disable(vcpu);
- }
}
void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 065251efa2e6..5a02d4c90559 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -162,25 +162,14 @@ static int handle_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
return 1;
}
-/*
- * Handle the guest trying to use a ptrauth instruction, or trying to access a
- * ptrauth register.
- */
-void kvm_arm_vcpu_ptrauth_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- if (vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
- vcpu_ptrauth_enable(vcpu);
- else
- kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
-}
-
/*
* Guest usage of a ptrauth instruction (which the guest EL1 did not turn into
- * a NOP).
+ * a NOP). If we get here, it is that we didn't fixup ptrauth on exit, and all
+ * that we can do is give the guest an UNDEF.
*/
static int kvm_handle_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
{
- kvm_arm_vcpu_ptrauth_trap(vcpu);
+ kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
return 1;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index c07a45643cd4..d60c2ef0fe8c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -490,6 +490,64 @@ static bool __hyp_text handle_tx2_tvm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return true;
}
+static bool __hyp_text esr_is_ptrauth_trap(u32 esr)
+{
+ u32 ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr);
+
+ if (ec == ESR_ELx_EC_PAC)
+ return true;
+
+ if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64)
+ return false;
+
+ switch (esr_sys64_to_sysreg(esr)) {
+ case SYS_APIAKEYLO_EL1:
+ case SYS_APIAKEYHI_EL1:
+ case SYS_APIBKEYLO_EL1:
+ case SYS_APIBKEYHI_EL1:
+ case SYS_APDAKEYLO_EL1:
+ case SYS_APDAKEYHI_EL1:
+ case SYS_APDBKEYLO_EL1:
+ case SYS_APDBKEYHI_EL1:
+ case SYS_APGAKEYLO_EL1:
+ case SYS_APGAKEYHI_EL1:
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+#define __ptrauth_save_key(regs, key) \
+({ \
+ regs[key ## KEYLO_EL1] = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ ## key ## KEYLO_EL1); \
+ regs[key ## KEYHI_EL1] = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ ## key ## KEYHI_EL1); \
+})
+
+static bool __hyp_text __hyp_handle_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt;
+ u64 val;
+
+ if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) ||
+ !esr_is_ptrauth_trap(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu)))
+ return false;
+
+ ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context);
+ __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APIA);
+ __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APIB);
+ __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APDA);
+ __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APDB);
+ __ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APGA);
+
+ vcpu_ptrauth_enable(vcpu);
+
+ val = read_sysreg(hcr_el2);
+ val |= (HCR_API | HCR_APK);
+ write_sysreg(val, hcr_el2);
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/*
* Return true when we were able to fixup the guest exit and should return to
* the guest, false when we should restore the host state and return to the
@@ -524,6 +582,9 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
if (__hyp_handle_fpsimd(vcpu))
return true;
+ if (__hyp_handle_ptrauth(vcpu))
+ return true;
+
if (!__populate_fault_info(vcpu))
return true;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index ad1d57501d6d..564995084cf8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1034,16 +1034,13 @@ static bool trap_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct sys_reg_params *p,
const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
{
- kvm_arm_vcpu_ptrauth_trap(vcpu);
-
/*
- * Return false for both cases as we never skip the trapped
- * instruction:
- *
- * - Either we re-execute the same key register access instruction
- * after enabling ptrauth.
- * - Or an UNDEF is injected as ptrauth is not supported/enabled.
+ * If we land here, that is because we didn't fixup the access on exit
+ * by allowing the PtrAuth sysregs. The only way this happens is when
+ * the guest does not have PtrAuth support enabled.
*/
+ kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+
return false;
}
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: Stop sparse from moaning at __hyp_this_cpu_ptr
2020-06-10 11:34 [PATCH v2 0/4] kvm: arm64: Pointer Authentication handling fixes Marc Zyngier
2020-06-10 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: Save the host's PtrAuth keys in non-preemptible context Marc Zyngier
2020-06-10 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: Handle PtrAuth traps early Marc Zyngier
@ 2020-06-10 11:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-10 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: Remove host_cpu_context member from vcpu structure Marc Zyngier
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2020-06-10 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Mark Rutland, kernel-team, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
James Morse, Andrew Scull, Will Deacon, Julien Thierry
Sparse complains that __hyp_this_cpu_ptr() returns something
that is flagged noderef and not in the correct address space
(both being the result of the __percpu annotation).
Pretend that __hyp_this_cpu_ptr() knows what it is doing by
forcefully casting the pointer with __kernel __force.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
Notes:
v2: Add __verify_pcpu_ptr() as suggested by Andrew Scull.
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
index 0c9b5fc4ba0a..d9b7da15dbca 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
@@ -81,12 +81,19 @@ extern u32 __kvm_get_mdcr_el2(void);
extern char __smccc_workaround_1_smc[__SMCCC_WORKAROUND_1_SMC_SZ];
-/* Home-grown __this_cpu_{ptr,read} variants that always work at HYP */
+/*
+ * Home-grown __this_cpu_{ptr,read} variants that always work at HYP,
+ * provided that sym is really a *symbol* and not a pointer obtained from
+ * a data structure. As for SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR(), the creative casting keeps
+ * sparse quiet.
+ */
#define __hyp_this_cpu_ptr(sym) \
({ \
- void *__ptr = hyp_symbol_addr(sym); \
+ void *__ptr; \
+ __verify_pcpu_ptr(&sym); \
+ __ptr = hyp_symbol_addr(sym); \
__ptr += read_sysreg(tpidr_el2); \
- (typeof(&sym))__ptr; \
+ (typeof(sym) __kernel __force *)__ptr; \
})
#define __hyp_this_cpu_read(sym) \
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: Remove host_cpu_context member from vcpu structure
2020-06-10 11:34 [PATCH v2 0/4] kvm: arm64: Pointer Authentication handling fixes Marc Zyngier
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-10 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: Stop sparse from moaning at __hyp_this_cpu_ptr Marc Zyngier
@ 2020-06-10 11:34 ` Marc Zyngier
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2020-06-10 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Mark Rutland, kernel-team, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
James Morse, Andrew Scull, Will Deacon, Julien Thierry
For very long, we have kept this pointer back to the per-cpu
host state, despite having working per-cpu accessors at EL2
for some time now.
Recent investigations have shown that this pointer is easy
to abuse in preemptible context, which is a sure sign that
it would better be gone. Not to mention that a per-cpu
pointer is faster to access at all times.
Reported-by: Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ---
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 3 ---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 6 +++---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 6 ++++--
arch/arm64/kvm/pmu.c | 8 ++------
6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 59029e90b557..ada1faa92211 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -284,9 +284,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
struct kvm_guest_debug_arch vcpu_debug_state;
struct kvm_guest_debug_arch external_debug_state;
- /* Pointer to host CPU context */
- struct kvm_cpu_context *host_cpu_context;
-
struct thread_info *host_thread_info; /* hyp VA */
struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd_state; /* hyp VA */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 14b747266607..6ddaa23ef346 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -340,10 +340,8 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
{
int *last_ran;
- kvm_host_data_t *cpu_data;
last_ran = this_cpu_ptr(vcpu->kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran);
- cpu_data = this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data);
/*
* We might get preempted before the vCPU actually runs, but
@@ -355,7 +353,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
}
vcpu->cpu = cpu;
- vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context = &cpu_data->host_ctxt;
kvm_vgic_load(vcpu);
kvm_timer_vcpu_load(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c
index 0fc9872a1467..e95af204fec7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ void __hyp_text __debug_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!(vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY))
return;
- host_ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context);
+ host_ctxt = &__hyp_this_cpu_ptr(kvm_host_data)->host_ctxt;
guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
host_dbg = &vcpu->arch.host_debug_state.regs;
guest_dbg = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.debug_ptr);
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ void __hyp_text __debug_switch_to_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!(vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY))
return;
- host_ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context);
+ host_ctxt = &__hyp_this_cpu_ptr(kvm_host_data)->host_ctxt;
guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
host_dbg = &vcpu->arch.host_debug_state.regs;
guest_dbg = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.debug_ptr);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index d60c2ef0fe8c..1853c1788e0c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text __hyp_handle_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
!esr_is_ptrauth_trap(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu)))
return false;
- ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context);
+ ctxt = &__hyp_this_cpu_ptr(kvm_host_data)->host_ctxt;
__ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APIA);
__ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APIB);
__ptrauth_save_key(ctxt->sys_regs, APDA);
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static int __kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct kvm_cpu_context *guest_ctxt;
u64 exit_code;
- host_ctxt = vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context;
+ host_ctxt = &__hyp_this_cpu_ptr(kvm_host_data)->host_ctxt;
host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu = vcpu;
guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
@@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu = kern_hyp_va(vcpu);
- host_ctxt = kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context);
+ host_ctxt = &__hyp_this_cpu_ptr(kvm_host_data)->host_ctxt;
host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu = vcpu;
guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
index 6d2df9fe0b5d..143d7b7358f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
@@ -265,12 +265,13 @@ void __hyp_text __sysreg32_restore_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
void kvm_vcpu_load_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt = vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context;
struct kvm_cpu_context *guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
+ struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
if (!has_vhe())
return;
+ host_ctxt = &__hyp_this_cpu_ptr(kvm_host_data)->host_ctxt;
__sysreg_save_user_state(host_ctxt);
/*
@@ -301,12 +302,13 @@ void kvm_vcpu_load_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
void kvm_vcpu_put_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt = vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context;
struct kvm_cpu_context *guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
+ struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
if (!has_vhe())
return;
+ host_ctxt = &__hyp_this_cpu_ptr(kvm_host_data)->host_ctxt;
deactivate_traps_vhe_put();
__sysreg_save_el1_state(guest_ctxt);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu.c
index e71d00bb5271..b5ae3a5d509e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -163,15 +163,13 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_pmu_disable_el0(unsigned long events)
*/
void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
struct kvm_host_data *host;
u32 events_guest, events_host;
if (!has_vhe())
return;
- host_ctxt = vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context;
- host = container_of(host_ctxt, struct kvm_host_data, host_ctxt);
+ host = this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data);
events_guest = host->pmu_events.events_guest;
events_host = host->pmu_events.events_host;
@@ -184,15 +182,13 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
struct kvm_host_data *host;
u32 events_guest, events_host;
if (!has_vhe())
return;
- host_ctxt = vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context;
- host = container_of(host_ctxt, struct kvm_host_data, host_ctxt);
+ host = this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data);
events_guest = host->pmu_events.events_guest;
events_host = host->pmu_events.events_host;
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread