From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B89FC433E1 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07776207D8 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="WaKrFz/r" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 07776207D8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pengutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Qe81C2U2hf4IREwCKE4Db1gVe+n5ycuLuLf2N0TN6vI=; b=WaKrFz/rVBms8v cUuyCzC33drBwmtxDZajL9Or2xvMUaCoGsEo8Utt7KEirusnnJDbzUmTnUlhIKQ7lLkP8DJT7Ekdn PjXG5ExmRaigZK4DNqhXi5GzNiVlDExGdrISKzEw289logCFs4kipyEvjRwJJ1k+hJepV9dHwNK6j tJV5AFfE5t47zCwAUS4Ff5Vi3CD778UAffZ0bXBoV5MekMuQ2iUEZyQ7Wyhg1zIuBEFu5/tMcfeYK 3jLGGBhS1yteaCa8CM6FbcywOpBm7vmiJ/huOc9C3lE0J1Q6jFMkp5okEHp/OIwb0rNwSpbFPHi1y lwKWKy0DOjG2Jagwyy7w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjiEz-0003xN-Ij; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:52:57 +0000 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjiEw-0003wu-Bm for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:52:56 +0000 Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jjiEt-0001TX-HX; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:52:51 +0200 Received: from sha by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jjiEs-0008JZ-6d; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:52:50 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:52:50 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: mvneta: Fix Serdes configuration for 2.5Gbps modes Message-ID: <20200612115250.GS11869@pengutronix.de> References: <20200612083847.29942-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20200612084710.GC1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200612100114.GE1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200612101820.GF1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200612104208.GG1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200612112213.GH1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200612113031.GI1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200612113031.GI1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-IRC: #ptxdist @freenode X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-Uptime: 13:42:38 up 113 days, 19:13, 128 users, load average: 0.04, 0.14, 0.15 User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sha@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200612_045254_402811_9DB06F0B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.88 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:30:31PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:22:13PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:42:08AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > > With the obvious mistakes fixed (extraneous 'i' and lack of default > > > case), it seems to still work on Armada 388 Clearfog Pro with 2.5G > > > modules. > > > > ... and the other bug fixed - mvneta_comphy_init() needs to be passed > > the interface mode. > > Unrelated to the patch, has anyone noticed that mvneta's performance > seems to have reduced? I've only just noticed it (which makes 2.5Gbps > rather pointless). This is iperf between two clearfogs with a 2.5G > fibre link: > > root@clearfog21:~# iperf -V -c fe80::250:43ff:fe02:303%eno2 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Client connecting to fe80::250:43ff:fe02:303%eno2, TCP port 5001 > TCP window size: 43.8 KByte (default) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > [ 3] local fe80::250:43ff:fe21:203 port 48928 connected with fe80::250:43ff:fe02:303 port 5001 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 553 MBytes 464 Mbits/sec > > I checked with Jon Nettleton, and he confirms my recollection that > mvneta on Armada 388 used to be able to fill a 2.5Gbps link. > > If Armada 388 can't manage, then I suspect Armada XP will have worse > performance being an earlier revision SoC. I only have one board with a Armada XP here which has a loopback cable between two ports. It gives me: [ 3] local 172.16.1.4 port 47002 connected with 172.16.1.0 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.27 GBytes 1.09 Gbits/sec Still not 2.5Gbps, but at least twice the data rate you get, plus my board has to handle both ends of the link. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel