public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Cc: "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] PCI: brcmstb: Set internal memory viewport sizes
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:05:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200616220533.GA1984551@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616205533.3513-10-james.quinlan@broadcom.com>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 04:55:16PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> BrcmSTB PCIe controllers are intimately connected to the memory
> controller(s) on the SOC.  There is a "viewport" for each memory controller
> that allows inbound accesses to CPU memory.  Each viewport's size must be
> set to a power of two, and that size must be equal to or larger than the
> amount of memory each controller supports.

This describes some requirements, but doesn't actually say what this
patch *does*.

I *think* it reads the viewport sizes from the "brcm,scb-sizes" DT
property instead of computing something from "dma-ranges".  Looks like
it also adds support for SCB1 and SCB2.

Those seem interesting, but don't really come through in the subject
or even the commit log.

If I understand correctly, this is all for DMA ("inbound accesses to
CPU memory").  I think it would be worth mentioning "DMA", since
that's the common term for this.

> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> index 9189406fd35c..39f77709c6a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
>  #define  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_MAX_BURST_SIZE_MASK	0x300000
>  #define  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_MAX_BURST_SIZE_128		0x0
>  #define  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB0_SIZE_MASK		0xf8000000
> +#define  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB1_SIZE_MASK		0x07c00000
> +#define  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB2_SIZE_MASK		0x0000001f
>  
>  #define PCIE_MISC_CPU_2_PCIE_MEM_WIN0_LO		0x400c
>  #define PCIE_MEM_WIN0_LO(win)	\
> @@ -154,6 +156,7 @@
>  #define SSC_STATUS_OFFSET		0x1
>  #define SSC_STATUS_SSC_MASK		0x400
>  #define SSC_STATUS_PLL_LOCK_MASK	0x800
> +#define PCIE_BRCM_MAX_MEMC		3
>  
>  #define IDX_ADDR(pcie)			(pcie->reg_offsets[EXT_CFG_INDEX])
>  #define DATA_ADDR(pcie)			(pcie->reg_offsets[EXT_CFG_DATA])
> @@ -260,6 +263,8 @@ struct brcm_pcie {
>  	const int		*reg_field_info;
>  	enum pcie_type		type;
>  	struct reset_control	*rescal;
> +	int			num_memc;
> +	u64			memc_size[PCIE_BRCM_MAX_MEMC];
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -715,22 +720,44 @@ static inline int brcm_pcie_get_rc_bar2_size_and_offset(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
>  							u64 *rc_bar2_offset)
>  {
>  	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
> -	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
>  	struct resource_entry *entry;
> +	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> +	u64 lowest_pcie_addr = ~(u64)0;
> +	int ret, i = 0;
> +	u64 size = 0;
>  
> -	entry = resource_list_first_type(&bridge->dma_ranges, IORESOURCE_MEM);
> -	if (!entry)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +	resource_list_for_each_entry(entry, &bridge->dma_ranges) {
> +		u64 pcie_beg = entry->res->start - entry->offset;
>  
> +		size += entry->res->end - entry->res->start + 1;
> +		if (pcie_beg < lowest_pcie_addr)
> +			lowest_pcie_addr = pcie_beg;
> +	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * The controller expects the inbound window offset to be calculated as
> -	 * the difference between PCIe's address space and CPU's. The offset
> -	 * provided by the firmware is calculated the opposite way, so we
> -	 * negate it.
> -	 */
> -	*rc_bar2_offset = -entry->offset;
> -	*rc_bar2_size = 1ULL << fls64(entry->res->end - entry->res->start);
> +	if (lowest_pcie_addr == ~(u64)0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "DT node has no dma-ranges\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_variable_u64_array(pcie->np, "brcm,scb-sizes", pcie->memc_size, 1,
> +						  PCIE_BRCM_MAX_MEMC);
> +
> +	if (ret <= 0) {
> +		/* Make an educated guess */
> +		pcie->num_memc = 1;
> +		pcie->memc_size[0] = 1 << fls64(size - 1);
> +	} else {
> +		pcie->num_memc = ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Each memc is viewed through a "port" that is a power of 2 */
> +	for (i = 0, size = 0; i < pcie->num_memc; i++)
> +		size += pcie->memc_size[i];
> +
> +	/* System memory starts at this address in PCIe-space */
> +	*rc_bar2_offset = lowest_pcie_addr;
> +	/* The sum of all memc views must also be a power of 2 */
> +	*rc_bar2_size = 1ULL << fls64(size - 1);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We validate the inbound memory view even though we should trust
> @@ -782,12 +809,11 @@ static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
>  	void __iomem *base = pcie->base;
>  	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
>  	struct resource_entry *entry;
> -	unsigned int scb_size_val;
>  	bool ssc_good = false;
>  	struct resource *res;
>  	int num_out_wins = 0;
>  	u16 nlw, cls, lnksta;
> -	int i, ret;
> +	int i, ret, memc;
>  	u32 tmp, aspm_support;
>  
>  	/* Reset the bridge */
> @@ -824,11 +850,17 @@ static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
>  	writel(upper_32_bits(rc_bar2_offset),
>  	       base + PCIE_MISC_RC_BAR2_CONFIG_HI);
>  
> -	scb_size_val = rc_bar2_size ?
> -		       ilog2(rc_bar2_size) - 15 : 0xf; /* 0xf is 1GB */
>  	tmp = readl(base + PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL);
> -	u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, scb_size_val,
> -			  PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB0_SIZE_MASK);
> +	for (memc = 0; memc < pcie->num_memc; memc++) {
> +		u32 scb_size_val = ilog2(pcie->memc_size[memc]) - 15;
> +
> +		if (memc == 0)
> +			u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, scb_size_val, PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB0_SIZE_MASK);
> +		else if (memc == 1)
> +			u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, scb_size_val, PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB1_SIZE_MASK);
> +		else if (memc == 2)
> +			u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, scb_size_val, PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_SCB2_SIZE_MASK);
> +	}
>  	writel(tmp, base + PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL);
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-16 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-16 20:55 [PATCH v5 00/12] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for more Brcmstb chips Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 22:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-06-16 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] PCI: brcmstb: Add bcm7278 register info Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] PCI: brcmstb: Add suspend and resume pm_ops Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] PCI: brcmstb: Add bcm7278 PERST support Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 22:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-06-16 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] PCI: brcmstb: Add control of rescal reset Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 22:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-06-17 17:32     ` Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] PCI: brcmstb: Set internal memory viewport sizes Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 22:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-06-17 17:28     ` Jim Quinlan
2020-06-18  3:01       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-06-18 14:56         ` Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] PCI: brcmstb: Accommodate MSI for older chips Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] PCI: brcmstb: Set bus max burst size by chip type Jim Quinlan
2020-06-16 20:55 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] PCI: brcmstb: Add bcm7211, bcm7216, bcm7445, bcm7278 to match list Jim Quinlan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200616220533.GA1984551@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox