From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Tom Stellard <tstellar@redhat.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: bti: Require clang >= 10.0.1 for in-kernel BTI support
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:06:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617090616.GO25945@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616183630.2445-1-will@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 07:36:30PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Unfortunately, most versions of clang that support BTI are capable of
> miscompiling the kernel when converting a switch statement into a jump
> table. As an example, attempting to spawn a KVM guest results in a panic:
>
> [ 56.253312] Kernel panic - not syncing: bad mode
> [ 56.253834] CPU: 0 PID: 279 Comm: lkvm Not tainted 5.8.0-rc1 #2
> [ 56.254225] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> [ 56.254712] Call trace:
> [ 56.254952] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1d4
> [ 56.255305] show_stack+0x1c/0x28
> [ 56.255647] dump_stack+0xc4/0x128
> [ 56.255905] panic+0x16c/0x35c
> [ 56.256146] bad_el0_sync+0x0/0x58
> [ 56.256403] el1_sync_handler+0xb4/0xe0
> [ 56.256674] el1_sync+0x7c/0x100
> [ 56.256928] kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic+0x74/0x98
> [ 56.257286] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x94/0xcc
> [ 56.257569] el0_svc_common+0x9c/0x150
> [ 56.257836] do_el0_svc+0x84/0x90
> [ 56.258083] el0_sync_handler+0xf8/0x298
> [ 56.258361] el0_sync+0x158/0x180
>
> This is because the switch in kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic()
> is executed as an indirect branch to tail-call through a jump table:
>
> ffff800010032dc8: 3869694c ldrb w12, [x10, x9]
> ffff800010032dcc: 8b0c096b add x11, x11, x12, lsl #2
> ffff800010032dd0: d61f0160 br x11
>
> However, where the target case uses the stack, the landing pad is elided
> due to the presence of a paciasp instruction:
>
> ffff800010032e14: d503233f paciasp
> ffff800010032e18: a9bf7bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> ffff800010032e1c: 910003fd mov x29, sp
> ffff800010032e20: aa0803e0 mov x0, x8
> ffff800010032e24: 940017c0 bl ffff800010038d24 <kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension>
> ffff800010032e28: 93407c00 sxtw x0, w0
> ffff800010032e2c: a8c17bfd ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
> ffff800010032e30: d50323bf autiasp
> ffff800010032e34: d65f03c0 ret
>
> Unfortunately, this results in a fatal exception because paciasp is
> compatible only with branch-and-link (call) instructions and not simple
> indirect branches.
>
> A fix is being merged into Clang 10.0.1 so that a 'bti j' instruction is
> emitted as an explicit landing pad in this situation. Make in-kernel
> BTI depend on that compiler version when building with clang.
>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Cc: Tom Stellard <tstellar@redhat.com>
> Cc: Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200615105524.GA2694@willie-the-truck
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 31380da53689..4ae2419c14a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -1630,6 +1630,8 @@ config ARM64_BTI_KERNEL
> depends on CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET_BTI
> # https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94697
> depends on !CC_IS_GCC || GCC_VERSION >= 100100
> + # https://reviews.llvm.org/rGb8ae3fdfa579dbf366b1bb1cbfdbf8c51db7fa55
> + depends on !CC_IS_CLANG || CLANG_VERSION >= 100001
> depends on !(CC_IS_CLANG && GCOV_KERNEL)
> depends on (!FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER || DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS)
> help
FWIW:
Acked-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
I've not tried to reproduce this myself, but the problem description and
proposed solution seem perfectly plausible, given how BTI works.
Cheers
---Dave
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-16 18:36 [PATCH] arm64: bti: Require clang >= 10.0.1 for in-kernel BTI support Will Deacon
2020-06-16 18:40 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-06-17 9:06 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2020-06-17 9:09 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-18 11:25 ` Daniel Kiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200617090616.GO25945@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=daniel.kiss@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=tstellar@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).