From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F14BC433DF for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D793420810 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="SGz8aKyD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D793420810 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=XqxVqCi1qhHCj9MKSwcd/WWIujlD/y0KBdw2+gdH87I=; b=SGz8aKyDEf09Y0 MVyhyQgHIyEt69k8sg2q83i/KRCzIJAZ3ggdlR+3WLKjzqueLAoYu6dtSEJZ+otGUhmzMrY8FX+lG 2wgjqv6UNoTHRKtxfabT8tQM58wPLnwHZ9jkuPMt4Cu0QWS1gGQu0YxZdSiR5nll2/T6yZiP/t1AT azQGMgA29Or2VuS01rg4lGZHqtDupu+/mQKJVkhkDPqUy0o85HjNuRAZLgWrPnuge326okf86BjM5 e+YMZBj1tRM/mszkC8XrorsA+CF2zgRt/aS6uJfa7zJjFvrU41E11N+tOsH8LAC0sqYFhUSTfj4cw vnkDKnbZb3w/lrcqh8zg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jlggb-0000aD-Lk; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:37:37 +0000 Received: from mail-il1-f194.google.com ([209.85.166.194]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jlggZ-0000ZJ-2D for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:37:36 +0000 Received: by mail-il1-f194.google.com with SMTP id j19so3915803ilk.9 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:37:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=ZpqmM5b2vnIEZM+uoBwaGezs/bIVuA8qCIC5e2tj4Mk=; b=dchXcpsAlcAwOUI5gANDRBFZlICA9NvG8A2E9ATMKclgbj2B/YDsgR/gOhe4KojDA/ ZicTdYRCy1C8WGcNck1Bes5ujC/xO7aA7C7XYFyjOGQDPorlFWzlgZrns7a1Cs5RalFh J5ihizZjroILf/d2QSXbjts+Wj7tIggFsnDWeaKNs57o4bt0F4fZ5UOmI/+Dbiv/G9BF OM0nfVnQKLC+uTO6dQvZ3H/kLLtk1FyEj5E+fxYuhQvpmw17pIv3cwebBp3byF7nFwTT SCyAJXPQTbjWaMGMpEA7F/Lf60nCaIuxlswhJVxjv6A7QOS9clL3CZzvFyfugtEbPJEj TbMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533AnJjNkDznMK2FDNHqujfKLLeHeoeZKxvd7hD4R0TbihGzFp8X 3O6id9FAZzUvAYTja/OYFg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAq5HXFt/cfdAiAR+bnOeSiQTllpHYl1CjJVPEXer5Qdf+2qJhDdxmi+THg3z+2BKJ3Mb/mA== X-Received: by 2002:a92:190:: with SMTP id 138mr1144486ilb.5.1592433454005; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 ([64.188.179.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm717751iov.53.2020.06.17.15.37.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 2965169 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:37:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:37:32 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Ricardo =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ca=F1uelo?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] dt-bindings: display: ti,tfp410.yaml: make the ports node optional Message-ID: <20200617223732.GB2953201@bogus> References: <20200611102356.31563-1-ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com> <20200611102356.31563-6-ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com> <20200611160817.GA6031@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <8ad9a397a5fa6cebd2a4e0170dfa96ad73907faf.camel@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8ad9a397a5fa6cebd2a4e0170dfa96ad73907faf.camel@collabora.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200617_153735_111963_955DF7BB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.77 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net, airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, Laurent Pinchart , kernel@collabora.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:38:07AM +0200, Ricardo Ca=F1uelo wrote: > Hi Laurent, > = > Thanks for reviewing the patch > = > On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 19:08 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Ricardo, > > = > > Thank you for the patch. > > = > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:23:56PM +0200, Ricardo Ca=F1uelo wrote: > > > Make the ports node optional, since there are some DTs that don't def= ine > > > any ports for ti,tfp410. > > > = > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ca=F1uelo > > = > > Shouldn't we fix those DTs instead ? What's the point of a TFP410 > > without ports in DT ? > = > This comes from the discussion in the previous version of this series. > = > In the DTs that don't define any ports (it's dove-sbc-a510.dts only, actu= ally) > it's not clear how to define the ports (I'm not familiar with this board). > Initially I defined a set of empty ports just to comply with the binding > requirements, but Rob suggested that we might as well declare them as opt= ional, > since having an empty port definition with no remote endpoints is no bett= er than > having no ports at all. I did? Must have missed some context. > I understand both opinions but I just don't know which is the best option= at > this point. Just leave the warning to be fixed. Rob _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel