From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E937FC433E3 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6EE7206F4 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="1xTBWCta" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B6EE7206F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=++Jn2RnpRS03gnAz1xupyYhv5WWlTe8srhFmAIDCdqQ=; b=1xTBWCtazd5dXnDwjTq26YEX3 SoQmu8y5pWcFldvkBYb/Q2FZkD7FRCTyEKQxJz9Wkm14v7F8lsybkK5k6GleBOss2q3a5Azw/qgEz yT8aGPgmTvoIDPG7G88lpjQxl3hDB8B9vuls9uCxyMyM1YmHtpm2XiKy9qWIPd8jVLL2pN/QRWE5M lzOcsbhXswBH/+V79vL/UOUQAcBaO/FUKpSMuLD9ZGKOAl7lU6exu8EaQ9HrpGwxvYsPyMhbaSlmU sqHc6MGkhNH8wpcyP0ab279tqaRqXM8TWQAz368vKp4eJcSaJRwYRAaV6+aYvRahwTgFsvtB0yIC2 lFiUhx3Dw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1juyWV-0008Gu-Bj; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:29:35 +0000 Received: from 8bytes.org ([2a01:238:4383:600:38bc:a715:4b6d:a889] helo=theia.8bytes.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1juyWS-0008Fa-Bd; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:29:33 +0000 Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E90736B; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:29:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:29:29 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Yong Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] MT6779 IOMMU SUPPORT Message-ID: <20200713132929.GR27672@8bytes.org> References: <20200703044127.27438-1-chao.hao@mediatek.com> <20200710141349.GJ27672@8bytes.org> <1594451493.16172.6.camel@mhfsdcap03> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1594451493.16172.6.camel@mhfsdcap03> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200713_092932_528259_EB169208 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.86 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, FY Yang , wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, TH Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Hao , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , ming-fan.chen@mediatek.com, anan.sun@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 03:11:33PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > The SMI part always go with the IOMMU, Could you also help apply the > mt6779 SMI basical part [1][2]. Both has already got reviewed-by from > Rob and Matthias. and the [3] in that patchset is for performance > improvement, it's not so necessary, it can be send in another patchset. > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176833/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176831/ Okay, applied these two to the arm/mediatek branch. Joerg _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel