From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Move struct sdei_event to header file
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:19:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200723161949.00000061@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200722095740.28560-15-gshan@redhat.com>
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:57:37 +1000
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
> This moves struct sdei_event to the header file so that it can be
> dereferenced by external modules. This is needed by the code to
> virtualize SDEI functionality, as part of the arm64/kvm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Hi Gavin,
One question inline.
Jonathan
> ---
> v2: Derived from "drivers/firmware/sdei: Identify event by struct"
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c | 20 ------------
> include/linux/arm_sdei.h | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
> index a52dcff59a20..bdd2de0149c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
> @@ -44,26 +44,6 @@ static asmlinkage void (*sdei_firmware_call)(unsigned long function_id,
> /* entry point from firmware to arch asm code */
> static unsigned long sdei_entry_point;
>
> -struct sdei_event {
> - /* These three are protected by the sdei_list_lock */
> - struct list_head list;
> - bool reregister;
> - bool reenable;
> -
> - u32 event_num;
> - u8 type;
> - u8 priority;
> -
> - /* This pointer is handed to firmware as the event argument. */
> - union {
> - /* Shared events */
> - struct sdei_registered_event *registered;
> -
> - /* CPU private events */
> - struct sdei_registered_event __percpu *private_registered;
> - };
> -};
> -
> /* Take the mutex for any API call or modification. Take the mutex first. */
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(sdei_events_lock);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h
> index 0a241c5c911d..fdc2f868d84b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,46 @@
> */
> typedef int (sdei_event_callback)(u32 event, struct pt_regs *regs, void *arg);
>
> +/*
> + * This struct represents an event that has been registered. The driver
> + * maintains a list of all events, and which ones are registered. (Private
> + * events have one entry in the list, but are registered on each CPU).
> + * A pointer to this struct is passed to firmware, and back to the event
> + * handler. The event handler can then use this to invoke the registered
> + * callback, without having to walk the list.
> + *
> + * For CPU private events, this structure is per-cpu.
> + */
> +struct sdei_registered_event {
> + /* For use by arch code: */
> + struct pt_regs interrupted_regs;
> +
> + sdei_event_callback *callback;
> + void *callback_arg;
> + u32 event_num;
> + u8 priority;
> +};
> +
> +struct sdei_event {
> + /* These three are protected by the sdei_list_lock */
As this patch leaves the sdei_list_lock as local to arm_sdei.c, is this comment still valid?
> + struct list_head list;
> + bool reregister;
> + bool reenable;
> +
> + u32 event_num;
> + u8 type;
> + u8 priority;
> +
> + /* This pointer is handed to firmware as the event argument. */
> + union {
> + /* Shared events */
> + struct sdei_registered_event *registered;
> +
> + /* CPU private events */
> + struct sdei_registered_event __percpu *private_registered;
> + };
> +};
> +
> /*
> * Register your callback to claim an event. The event must be described
> * by firmware.
> @@ -51,27 +91,6 @@ static inline int sdei_mask_local_cpu(void) { return 0; }
> static inline int sdei_unmask_local_cpu(void) { return 0; }
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE */
>
> -
> -/*
> - * This struct represents an event that has been registered. The driver
> - * maintains a list of all events, and which ones are registered. (Private
> - * events have one entry in the list, but are registered on each CPU).
> - * A pointer to this struct is passed to firmware, and back to the event
> - * handler. The event handler can then use this to invoke the registered
> - * callback, without having to walk the list.
> - *
> - * For CPU private events, this structure is per-cpu.
> - */
> -struct sdei_registered_event {
> - /* For use by arch code: */
> - struct pt_regs interrupted_regs;
> -
> - sdei_event_callback *callback;
> - void *callback_arg;
> - u32 event_num;
> - u8 priority;
> -};
> -
> /* The arch code entry point should then call this when an event arrives. */
> int notrace sdei_event_handler(struct pt_regs *regs,
> struct sdei_registered_event *arg);
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-23 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-22 9:57 [PATCH v2 00/17] Refactor SDEI client driver Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Remove sdei_is_err() Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Common block for failing path in sdei_event_create() Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Retrieve event number from event instance Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Avoid nested statements in sdei_init() Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Unregister driver on error " Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Remove duplicate check in sdei_get_conduit() Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Remove Drop redundant error message in sdei_probe() Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Remove while loop in sdei_event_register() Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Remove while loop in sdei_event_unregister() Gavin Shan
2020-07-23 15:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 0:22 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Cleanup on cross call function Gavin Shan
2020-07-23 15:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 0:33 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-27 8:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 9:45 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Introduce sdei_do_local_call() Gavin Shan
2020-07-23 15:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 0:41 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Remove _sdei_event_register() Gavin Shan
2020-07-23 15:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 0:42 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Remove _sdei_event_unregister() Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Move struct sdei_event to header file Gavin Shan
2020-07-23 15:19 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-07-27 0:46 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-27 9:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 9:59 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-27 13:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-28 2:52 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Identify event by struct sdei_event Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Retrieve event signaled property on registration Gavin Shan
2020-07-23 15:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 0:53 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-27 9:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 10:03 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-27 13:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-28 2:56 ` Gavin Shan
2020-07-22 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] drivers/firmware/sdei: Add sdei_event_get_info() Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200723161949.00000061@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).