From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC90C433E0 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 198DC20737 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="AHv5DX5I" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 198DC20737 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=25BqYAO9YEZrWrekJ5cL44xVpQdjjzHyMJq3XuY4Iwo=; b=AHv5DX5IYwqipEOsbdHxIDj64 L9uXBfki/K5zU6FHlEPUyMnpSnJY6EeSg19e2H8DzdmkouS7RFcxvGpJOjjz/77WyAfvJPWl/ZJNC C9++8XL+XEqlhWh9QNVKz9jK/Eia70YiPkBBRr9kcvkp0fkB5rb44KT7Xjrb+2uPDkxXwdObl00Zm eRZihy7PPuhk/6D2sIkVEVybIfUopIe3sGnw2ftU1DWlHL/AYdJjEQhFXIadwZwSw3puZGSWg9RZQ ETBuUnZs8nOm58PfNtB7Q3heC584X7HHeSZmyBNFuH/eSH4VLk18M7Dmv+mplu2TH3SgGOJM6JdGG b7mpepJiQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jywme-0002GH-Lk; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:26:40 +0000 Received: from 8bytes.org ([2a01:238:4383:600:38bc:a715:4b6d:a889] helo=theia.8bytes.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jywma-0002FA-TG for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:26:37 +0000 Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7BF3346A; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:26:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:26:33 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iommu/arm-smmu: Updates for 5.9 Message-ID: <20200724122632.GS27672@8bytes.org> References: <20200721080352.GA13023@willie-the-truck> <20200722133323.GG27672@8bytes.org> <20200724115109.GA17451@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200724115109.GA17451@willie-the-truck> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200724_082637_084127_0C1CFDD7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel-team@android.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Will, On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:51:09PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Sure, that makes sense to me: I've included a diff below in case anybody > has comments. I've tackled it slightly differently to how the intel and > amd drivers are handled, since we have a header file (arm-smmu.h) which > is shared by a couple of different drivers. I've also moved the v3 driver > under the arm/ directory as Jean Philippe plans to split out the SVA work > for 5.10. > > I'll send a second pull early next week if there are no objections (or > you can pick this patch directly). Thanks, the diff looks fine to me. Joerg _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel