From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1810FC433E0 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34862074B for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="HHvDuJx1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D34862074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NvgbJMpCweNPOUFxZ7lq3kMoK3XeOgxpRdXLBcRvum4=; b=HHvDuJx1XuZ6nP0Jcxvu+PeSk xbspb8WX5aSJiVGVb7uXbOLump6N1N7AJhrMPmFg6wfSeMuwu7Xf6NpOvAoxBF3BQ5x96S0g+khD9 tGQyTQUJ1Ey1abHjUVGpQp1QIgQMT0lH1hCzbrxVyEXpz86IkKJ8YyiSmUyl3Sq9Y0YmbzPiktL5I SMeTxHLbfgWsSkgIX68iI9tSHhpLqhDLwgvuOuArpNDQOqv81bdKvN3YQQg2g5uFyb6ARsA+HUFKH THii1RQSKerTlBbK7kZDsTdtA2pde8g5bbo1MNyRDArb0DWKj123u+BlVB8KlU/jzXGNFtF5b3Ijd /nmMP9gDA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k1NsA-0006xb-So; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:46:26 +0000 Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60] helo=1wt.eu) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k1Ns7-0006xD-V3 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:46:25 +0000 Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 06V5k2gM016532; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:46:02 +0200 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:46:02 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: arm64: pointer_auth.h:40:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_random_bytes'; did you mean 'get_random_once'? Message-ID: <20200731054602.GA16529@1wt.eu> References: <20200730211522.1ea3561f@canb.auug.org.au> <7b0c0f44-f56d-5e71-cf86-dbdea190267a@ti.com> <20200731021631.GA8247@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200731_014624_280998_47E17BE2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.83 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Stephen Rothwell , Grygorii Strashko , Theodore Ts'o , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Naresh Kamboju , Richard Henderson , open list , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Mark Brown , hsinyi@chromium.org, Emese Revfy , Will Deacon , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:25:41PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:16 PM Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > Don't you want to take Mark's patch anyway in addition to all this ? In > > case anyone meets yet another build issue, they'd have more luck trying > > to revert any other patch. Right now if they revert one, it breaks the > > build in a different way and doesn't help much. > > I think Will picked up Mark's patch into the arm64 tree, so I felt I > should let it come in eventually that way. OK then! > The immediate problems seem to have been resolved. > > Knock wood. Yes, that's my feeling as well. I'm going to resend you your patch moving prandom32 definitions to prandom.h rebased on these latest changes, add add a commit message. It would be nice for 5.9, but maybe it could put an end to this mess once for all :-/ Willy _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel