Re: [PATCH] arm64: tlb: fix ARM64_TLB_RANGE with LLVM's integrated assembler

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2@huawei.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: tlb: fix ARM64_TLB_RANGE with LLVM's integrated assembler
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:30:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200806113053.GB23785@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdncvJbxphoDFdWTeiMnuu4pDie9xCxA-dC=__CK9p1KBw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 12:15:54PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 11:19 AM Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit 7c78f67e9bd9 ("arm64: enable tlbi range instructions") breaks
> > LLVM's integrated assembler, because -Wa,-march is only passed to
> > external assemblers and therefore, the new instructions are not enabled
> > when IAS is used.
> >
> > As binutils doesn't support .arch_extension tlb-rmi, this change adds
> > .arch armv8.4-a to __TLBI_0 and __TLBI_1 to fix the issue with both LLVM
> > IAS and binutils.
> >
> > Fixes: 7c78f67e9bd9 ("arm64: enable tlbi range instructions")
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1106
> > Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> 
> I've filed https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26339 to
> discuss more with ARM binutils devs about some of the compat issues
> around these assembler directives.

Until we get some alignment between binutils and the LLVM's integrated
assembler, the latter will be officially unsupported by the kernel. It's
just insane to maintain different options for architecture extensions,
e.g. memtag vs mte, armv8.4-a vs tlb-rmi. Even worse, I think you can't
add some .arch_extension in binutils without bumping the .arch version.
So maybe ".arch_extension tlb-rmi" works for the integrated assembler
but, if such option is added to binutils, it would require ".arch
armv8.4-a" as well.

So, please sort it out guys, collaborate between yourselves when
inventing architecture mnemonics so that you are aligned.

We make take the occasional patch to fix the integrated assembler if
it's not intrusive but at some point we may say it's just not supported
and reject the fix. We have a hard line on the compiler not generating
newer than ARMv8.0 instructions (unless they are in the NOP/HINT space),
so we limit newer instructions to (inline) asm. That's why -march
doesn't work, it needs to be -Wa,-march.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel