From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A23C433E1 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61248206B5 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="I662zHyZ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 61248206B5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=4AmHt2kOUTIOfgIriM3OcpohMZ9vRHBYo9VUjcM/ZzA=; b=I662zHyZZU148YQv95f0vCoMQ +W2ISWuAy/vMkPcGF+tiSH0v0bZCSglzk6WZLOwZv4/mq+KUXdDxzh/QWl0VjHsUS8eQVuSQV+Kf1 VRRavxlonKCpQi5iwFkezeSYJIOQKY8qM655Htww/Hx2SWlThqDUOhz5TMIe0LQkphCBK8uUrvA9E Qz+wUEtJvvQ3pXFmZze7od58FRTStCZ4i4WDCNQXFbh4fJ6E/cySnWGtgyktTU+2eyepnwgwSeyOm yvpE6JdcY5+C/j4Rzha8JuLSffEddpVwhaFf2mAoKEUW75UI8tYE8vEqqVyRTIztm3FGwcy4ql/8A KWGew0awQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k8Lgj-0004DQ-8G; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:51:25 +0000 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k8Lgg-0004Bc-1t for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:51:23 +0000 X-Originating-IP: 90.66.108.79 Received: from localhost (lfbn-lyo-1-1932-79.w90-66.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.66.108.79]) (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53C061C0006; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:51:16 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Reto Schneider Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add GARDENA smart Gateway AT91SAM board Message-ID: <20200819105116.GI4500@piout.net> References: <20200810171921.8679-1-code@reto-schneider.ch> <20200817102136.GC4500@piout.net> <02431938-63ac-7f90-d985-534bcd60aac2@reto-schneider.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02431938-63ac-7f90-d985-534bcd60aac2@reto-schneider.ch> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200819_065122_226566_947EB3CE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.86 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Michael Zimmermann , open list , Ludovic Desroches , Rob Herring , Stefan Roese , Reto Schneider , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 19/08/2020 11:04:48+0200, Reto Schneider wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On 8/17/20 12:21 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > Thank you for this submission. > > Thanks a lot for the feedback. > > I will send a v2. > > > Overall, I'm not convinced it is a good idea to start from > > at91sam9x5ek.dtsi as it makes you dtb bigger than necessary but if you > > want it that way, I'm fine with that. > > Because using at91sam9x5ek.dtsi saves some code (maintenance effort?!) I > am willing to accept the extra binary size. > However, if you think that this causes the maintenance efforts to be > greater than when doing it your way, I'd be up for changing it. > I'd say at91sam9x5ek.dtsi has very little chances to change and even if this is the case, it will probably not break your device tree but it is still a possibility. As said, I'll let you choose. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel