From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9476CC433E1 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 17:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64BC0206FA for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 17:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="OYKornJA"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qiz+7emY" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 64BC0206FA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=kE/kjnBCoa22zBBQJMdF2Z0LIRgojw1R32mw5dzrORk=; b=OYKornJAuIdsshz1yyLRMVW9R g+V8PT/x60IZNixiJ5VgCcxiK6YQWZNljs7MxxhzIFl+syTsH78j2BRvCmRs6IpBL6s2EOjV4c5bJ /D0bse7xRTAwKJ7xxFYhgn3oGAX39C7ikYqV2xkoqJ+7NCU/56glko/mOajSMbU5cueq/uxuzqDVe uiQzSDTEpjG/jb22NyONOceE0eAV0sqTXfWz5ymlTbi3KrYwZALwsyfi3Ym14OW1ZfqP7QHs/LlDf +VD67qKUEAzaWSmEYRJ7muTf/vV5+wAiEn1jWzlmmDpvRf/JmivcN8HzKF66VjD187q6B1Ar47R64 B/RsPV20w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k8RvO-0000ry-Je; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 17:30:58 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k8RvM-0000rT-04 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 17:30:56 +0000 Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E80CA206FA; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 17:30:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597858255; bh=l0KFEp2dDJCxx7pF7ESctcMNER5x8l1jMFgx6UM7GHE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qiz+7emYTNAzRzu0cndsEYJKOjF4i1zowG9c1JBxr7ipBO2QyTlrN7cha9WCWYe5R Dt9GqNsmon013InJOCcQvTA+CtORr5WDRoMt5iViJ0A9g7YGDtujAWvDe2Cbxn+IVh WNlNP5CHVkz3PCWYgIqwBIQfVvfN15CYfRiYkxZU= Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:30:50 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mathieu Poirier Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add entries for CoreSight and Arm SPE Message-ID: <20200819173050.GA18091@willie-the-truck> References: <20200817193140.3659956-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200819_133056_202723_E57952C2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.54 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , John Garry , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Leo Yan , Jiri Olsa , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:01:38AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 11:56, John Garry wrote: > > On 17/08/2020 20:31, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > index 4e2698cc7e23..f9bb76baeec9 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -13427,8 +13427,18 @@ F: tools/perf/ > > > PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM ARM64 PMU EVENTS > > > R: John Garry > > > R: Will Deacon > > > +R: Mathieu Poirier > > > +R: Leo Yan > > > L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > > > S: Supported > > > +F: tools/build/feature/test-libopencsd.c > > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c > > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.* > > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c > > > +F: tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c > > > +F: tools/perf/util/arm-spe.h > > > +F: tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/* > > > +F: tools/perf/util/cs-etm.* > > > > But from the previous discussion, I thought that we wanted an entry to > > cover all tools/perf/arch/arm64/ and other related folders. Or was it > > just put all special interest parts (like SPE support) under one entry > > and leave the other arm/arm64 parts to be caught by "PERFORMANCE EVENTS > > SUBSYSTEM" entry? > > I do not have the time to maintain anything outside of coresight - > listing individual files as I did removes any ambiguity on that front. > I'm happy to add tools/perf/arch/arm and tools/perf/arch/arm64/ if you > agree to maintain them. In that case you will have to be more > specific about the "other related folders" you are referring to above. None of us have time for this, hence why I think putting us all in one entry with all of the files listed there makes the most sense; then people do whatever they can and try to help each other out based on how much time they have. I think that's much better than fine-grained maintainership where a given file has a single point of failure. So I think it should include: tools/perf/arch/arm64/ tools/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ along with the SPE and Coresight files. Arnaldo would still handle the patches, so this is really about giving us a chance to review incoming patches without having to fish them out from the lists. Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel