From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E619CC433DF for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9ECC20738 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="G9HMbLmq"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="c/nEA1x+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A9ECC20738 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type:Cc: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=fSNN6ZtdvGZBMsCQDIbkeCKmlzSR6gRgBo5NeU3WLTs=; b=G9HMbLmqDcRFrphj0c2qzKX5A bW/8hDggd7IC/fwx9Bxq8Mipb4NT9svU+FFzOS7D1zsZR8roqAxr71oKKHh0IA2pJ5qGvIxFjUjgE zl57JVOOLEjawIqXS1e4x54RZDVK63xtuq0o/2oHLBtnPiJ1fn6RjQLjIR6Oc4sYOonXaPqz0oGB1 Nei1VDgY3iMsvp7tfImFByElXy7JhcgFPB5zR1jvkEqMjN6lI1QJYKr+Xr9Dic3u4oy0TrmXMbrqj KKo1ETut8Da8EZYPrrIHyDJdsQZRgvgn1S1gyud+S9miE7LisFjWSUhxu7vAvpEe8PkZGd/fG0sbb i8rlAkcAg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kAZMA-0001GL-SY; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:51:22 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kAZM7-0001Fg-Re for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:51:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (p54b33ab6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.179.58.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FC0920738; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:51:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598363478; bh=eIq1K4YwKevM0Z+xrupyI1e4rDXhwcMQbYLXwiGI9/k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=c/nEA1x+7z5tdSDCHfM2LAtZREXzJ6s4HkGFN6S67BQdim72iZxz/GpoalDTz3RwP /j2Xzj35IPHY1BTNwALSCQWqDUO384Y8Jjs50Goj8hZJ2OfihVB+iKk1N/B+vIdClc amqwfY1JgAc6wOJPiKHGo+g48C6r7/OieN3ZJsNc= Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:51:13 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support Message-ID: <20200825135113.GB1753@kunai> Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Maxime Ripard , Lee Jones , Frank Lee , Frank Lee , Rob Herring , Chen-Yu Tsai , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , gregory.clement@bootlin.com, Thomas Gleixner , jason@lakedaemon.net, Marc Zyngier , Srini Kandagatla , Linus Walleij , Vasily Khoruzhick , Zhang Rui , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , "p.zabel" , Icenowy Zheng , =?utf-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej?= Jirman , clabbe@baylibre.com, bage@linutronix.de, devicetree , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-clk , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio , Linux PM References: <20200824080327.GH3248864@dell> <20200825085532.vv4dpuzmjnshm5qn@gilmour.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200825085532.vv4dpuzmjnshm5qn@gilmour.lan> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200825_095120_054304_2B561225 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.14 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej?= Jirman , Frank Lee , Linus Walleij , Srini Kandagatla , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Frank Lee , Lee Jones , linux-clk , Amit Kucheria , Marc Zyngier , gregory.clement@bootlin.com, Daniel Lezcano , Vasily Khoruzhick , Chen-Yu Tsai , clabbe@baylibre.com, Zhang Rui , Michael Turquette , Icenowy Zheng , devicetree , jason@lakedaemon.net, bage@linutronix.de, Linux PM , linux-gpio , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM , Stephen Boyd , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "p.zabel" Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2655093340315455611==" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============2655093340315455611== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y" Content-Disposition: inline --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:55:32AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:03:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2020, Frank Lee wrote: > >=20 > > > ping...... > >=20 > > "Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable > > time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences > > and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical > > bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If > > there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those > > to be addressed. Sending content free pings just adds to the mail > > volume (if they are seen at all) and if something has gone wrong > > you'll have to resend the patches anyway so [RESEND]ing with any > > comments addressed is generally a much better approach." >=20 > This is true to some extent, but pinging after a month doesn't seem > unreasonable either. Especially if resending would mean up to 16 patches sent again. --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAl9FF00ACgkQFA3kzBSg KbaQCw/7B0HkLUNDaoRkScvwvMsZwnYphPCyyQwyYSGMOlmp9LUnRLs8wgHuKwvF U65QpySYVeF2oRjy1Q5u7oXEQUnprwXLXkVaHt832UpeCw6nvKs/i8Rs8H+0tWo9 /O7pxPMFrUouMTUAkAqKuKsCOFRflr2R32JquWopYWi+MgzoPAWV1OAtOC0XHdqw lWnioiMvY3Japg4eaqxLWZ5nqp8XYy+qXGwJdtiWkFu8+LnTvTcK+stQqROhYlKm 6Cm6Uy13ngTrnB4ait2I/+YKuwljumU6m8xuxyb7a/j2ZWO80LBwoCiRdGNE1A7V SEDzhfVmYNjeHqCBB3Vryx5N5Bkz4Be6paj8tthKHjAXxBbLYfheaXeO6aLpd4l0 sshVn10Dv84yYcL8GR4baFQCrNiZivjEZiVFXeiA6ygkQeNkQPoT4jGVYiHiNzuO y2TAjUKypZ2Dst24Q+38o9HUTa38mSIKKcif0SwmbryPq6NL0elOgd2F68KQJzSk ob/zI8yw9nK9Kiz6JpjvKBv+Aaf25R1U7a/URD0VcgJVdUv3X0RJ0yk79HSNeP89 fEz9mx9k6sK09qRFLZTcYJ/whlSa0SONFcfEma3W7iVmDzjFDW0ZftzMneSFVRbp HY/EadYE5G3VNklMSNhyT9Bf9ArEoxN9osMTzwSgpiHzAovoq+o= =iNuN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y-- --===============2655093340315455611== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============2655093340315455611==--