From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] perf: Remove x86 specific rdpmc test
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:11:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200831091113.GA406859@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200828205614.3391252-10-robh@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 02:56:14PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a common libperf based userspace counter read test
> with the same functionality as the x86 specific rdpmc test, let's remove
> it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> This one is optional. On the plus side, it eliminates a copy of the read
> loop. The main downside I see is loosing the ability to test in 'perf test'.
>
>
> tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h | 1 -
> tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/Build | 1 -
> tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/arch-tests.c | 4 -
> tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c | 182 -----------------------
> 4 files changed, 188 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
> index c41c5affe4be..d9c32ba0cdac 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
> struct test;
>
> /* Tests */
> -int test__rdpmc(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest);
we don't currently run libperf tests as part of perf test suite,
so before we do that, I rather not remove the tests..
feel free to add the code that runs libperf tests within 'perf test'
command ;-)
thanks,
jirka
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-31 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-28 20:56 [PATCH v2 0/9] libperf and arm64 userspace counter access support Rob Herring
2020-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] arm64: pmu: Add hook to handle pmu-related undefined instructions Rob Herring
2020-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] arm64: pmu: Add function implementation to update event index in userpage Rob Herring
2020-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] arm64: perf: Enable pmu counter direct access for perf event on armv8 Rob Herring
2020-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] tools/include: Add an initial math64.h Rob Herring
2020-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] libperf: Add support for user space counter access Rob Herring
2020-08-31 9:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-09-02 16:58 ` Rob Herring
2020-08-31 9:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-09-02 17:01 ` Rob Herring
2020-09-02 18:07 ` Ian Rogers
2020-09-02 19:48 ` Rob Herring
2020-09-04 5:51 ` Ian Rogers
2020-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] libperf: Add arm64 support to perf_mmap__read_self() Rob Herring
2020-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] perf: arm64: Add test for userspace counter access on heterogeneous systems Rob Herring
2020-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] Documentation: arm64: Document PMU counters access from userspace Rob Herring
2020-08-28 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] perf: Remove x86 specific rdpmc test Rob Herring
2020-08-31 9:11 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200831091113.GA406859@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raphael.gault@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).