From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2EEC433E2 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88FC8206EF for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="IxIoznd8"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="FrFAKUeG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 88FC8206EF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=IDj86zXFzm5ug0T1QFAhAOkWRBIWugMB6QWnwSNEvrQ=; b=IxIoznd8HQKtMGpcBXUSx2Nua Njb735xluUqYqgzbTVvN53FVaBx0xvrGAKNNwqNhwn3iyr7adwPhb4RAYdhMbu6kSzY5WFQ/9zPm8 J0xAnd9Hvk9+m22mIJ2Wu1z7K3Ko9TpUjTNLQB2BTWT2xBOkdlYPByZggFO/V7ktCas/Ytyf/NY28 6kVjf1O/qnO63NFpo6oDPDpMvC4rksRU1O9eQnXog7ozuqZgVqrNnqLEmz78uvfLb5O7BGp6mJXYH Rdr8XrhCLBWq9ddcfbsb9vWuwLPPqhm/KRQl2MlR0oxG6pwsBDGhozQ3r+3+q/blluHmFRq4gbdDl J1B7TkO4g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kDEoH-0001SH-Ps; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 22:31:25 +0000 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kDEo4-0001MJ-Ei for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 22:31:15 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 081MV62J120504; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:31:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1598999466; bh=72XLuEaISOE8Zy22FQhjAfdivo8oq+kRiT6rRPCMuno=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=FrFAKUeG6BVlvnRcJCVoWshse5GFWS3Vid8PekzxoR65U2iWNb0YqR7O5N5+zqWah f36HmZoE8HfkSasMriGLvqHxo+X3/n6vSD+FQuTEOAHP3nlU2EqZpbqtgcfwTfOSUU GdhsZGoK+M/IW6PiQOqO8DKf7qwUBFMp2KfuNwdw= Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (dfle110.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.31]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 081MV6WH029131 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:31:06 -0500 Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:31:06 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:31:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 081MV5f2060407; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:31:05 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Rob Herring , Tero Kristo Subject: [PATCH 2/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65*: Use generic clock for serdes clock name Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:30:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20200901223059.14801-3-nm@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200901223059.14801-1-nm@ti.com> References: <20200901223059.14801-1-nm@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200901_183112_564018_06E0A15A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.50 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nishanth Menon , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, Vignesh Raghavendra , lokeshvutla@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Use clock@ naming for nodes following standard conventions of device tree (section 2.2.2 Generic Names recommendation in [1]). [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/tree/v0.3 Suggested-by: Suman Anna Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi index 336d09d6fec7..03e28fc256de 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi @@ -327,12 +327,12 @@ reg = <0x00000210 0x4>; }; - serdes0_clk: serdes_clk@4080 { + serdes0_clk: clock@4080 { compatible = "syscon"; reg = <0x00004080 0x4>; }; - serdes1_clk: serdes_clk@4090 { + serdes1_clk: clock@4090 { compatible = "syscon"; reg = <0x00004090 0x4>; }; -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel