linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	boian4o1@gmail.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	amit.kachhap@arm.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kselftests/arm64: add PAuth test for whether exec() changes keys
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:00:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902170052.GJ6642@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200828131606.7946-4-boyan.karatotev@arm.com>

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 02:16:05PM +0100, Boyan Karatotev wrote:
> Kernel documentation states that it will change PAuth keys on exec() calls.
> 
> Verify that all keys are correctly switched to new ones.
> 
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/Makefile  |   4 +
>  .../selftests/arm64/pauth/exec_target.c       |  35 +++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/helper.h  |  10 ++
>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/pac.c     | 148 ++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 197 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/exec_target.c
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/Makefile
> index a017d1c8dd58..2e237b21ccf6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ CFLAGS += -mbranch-protection=pac-ret
>  
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS := pac
>  TEST_GEN_FILES := pac_corruptor.o helper.o
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED := exec_target
>  
>  include ../../lib.mk
>  
> @@ -20,6 +21,9 @@ $(OUTPUT)/helper.o: helper.c
>  # greater, gcc emits pac* instructions which are not in HINT NOP space,
>  # preventing the tests from occurring at all. Compile for ARMv8.2 so tests can
>  # run on earlier targets and print a meaningful error messages
> +$(OUTPUT)/exec_target: exec_target.c $(OUTPUT)/helper.o
> +	$(CC) $^ -o $@ $(CFLAGS) -march=armv8.2-a
> +
>  $(OUTPUT)/pac: pac.c $(OUTPUT)/pac_corruptor.o $(OUTPUT)/helper.o
>  	$(CC) $^ -o $@ $(CFLAGS) -march=armv8.2-a
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/exec_target.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/exec_target.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..07addef5a1d7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/exec_target.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright (C) 2020 ARM Limited
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <sys/auxv.h>
> +
> +#include "helper.h"
> +
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> +	struct signatures signed_vals;
> +	unsigned long hwcaps;
> +	size_t val;
> +
> +	fread(&val, sizeof(size_t), 1, stdin);
> +
> +	/* don't try to execute illegal (unimplemented) instructions) caller
> +	 * should have checked this and keep worker simple
> +	 */
> +	hwcaps = getauxval(AT_HWCAP);
> +
> +	if (hwcaps & HWCAP_PACA) {
> +		signed_vals.keyia = keyia_sign(val);
> +		signed_vals.keyib = keyib_sign(val);
> +		signed_vals.keyda = keyda_sign(val);
> +		signed_vals.keydb = keydb_sign(val);
> +	}
> +	signed_vals.keyg = (hwcaps & HWCAP_PACG) ?  keyg_sign(val) : 0;
> +
> +	fwrite(&signed_vals, sizeof(struct signatures), 1, stdout);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/helper.h b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/helper.h
> index b3cf709e249d..fceaa1e4824a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/helper.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/helper.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,16 @@
>  
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  
> +#define NKEYS 5
> +
> +
> +struct signatures {
> +	size_t keyia;
> +	size_t keyib;
> +	size_t keyda;
> +	size_t keydb;
> +	size_t keyg;
> +};
>  
>  void pac_corruptor(void);
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/pac.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/pac.c
> index cdbffa8bf61e..16dea47b11c7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/pac.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/pauth/pac.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
>  // Copyright (C) 2020 ARM Limited
>  
>  #include <sys/auxv.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/wait.h>
>  #include <signal.h>
>  
>  #include "../../kselftest_harness.h"
> @@ -33,6 +35,117 @@ do { \
>  } while (0)
>  
>  
> +void sign_specific(struct signatures *sign, size_t val)
> +{
> +	sign->keyia = keyia_sign(val);
> +	sign->keyib = keyib_sign(val);
> +	sign->keyda = keyda_sign(val);
> +	sign->keydb = keydb_sign(val);
> +}
> +
> +void sign_all(struct signatures *sign, size_t val)
> +{
> +	sign->keyia = keyia_sign(val);
> +	sign->keyib = keyib_sign(val);
> +	sign->keyda = keyda_sign(val);
> +	sign->keydb = keydb_sign(val);
> +	sign->keyg  = keyg_sign(val);
> +}
> +
> +int are_same(struct signatures *old, struct signatures *new, int nkeys)
> +{
> +	int res = 0;
> +
> +	res |= old->keyia == new->keyia;
> +	res |= old->keyib == new->keyib;
> +	res |= old->keyda == new->keyda;
> +	res |= old->keydb == new->keydb;
> +	if (nkeys == NKEYS)
> +		res |= old->keyg  == new->keyg;
> +
> +	return res;
> +}
> +
> +int exec_sign_all(struct signatures *signed_vals, size_t val)
> +{

Could popen(3) be used here?

Fork-and-exec is notoriously fiddly, so it's preferable to use a library
function to do it where applicable.

[...]

Cheers
---Dave

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-02 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-28 13:16 [PATCH 0/4] kselftests/arm64: add PAuth tests Boyan Karatotev
2020-08-28 13:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] kselftests/arm64: add a basic Pointer Authentication test Boyan Karatotev
2020-08-28 14:28   ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-08-31  8:05   ` Amit Kachhap
2020-09-02 16:49   ` Dave Martin
2020-09-03 10:12     ` Boyan Karatotev
2020-09-07 10:23       ` Dave Martin
2020-08-28 13:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] kselftests/arm64: add nop checks for PAuth tests Boyan Karatotev
2020-08-28 14:30   ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-08-31  8:09   ` Amit Kachhap
2020-08-28 13:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] kselftests/arm64: add PAuth test for whether exec() changes keys Boyan Karatotev
2020-08-28 14:33   ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-08-31  8:13   ` Amit Kachhap
2020-09-02 17:00   ` Dave Martin [this message]
2020-09-03 10:20     ` Boyan Karatotev
2020-09-07 10:27       ` Dave Martin
2020-09-15 15:18         ` Boyan Karatotev
2020-09-16 15:38           ` Dave Martin
2020-08-28 13:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] kselftests/arm64: add PAuth tests for single threaded consistency and key uniqueness Boyan Karatotev
2020-08-28 14:36   ` Vincenzo Frascino
2020-08-31  8:20   ` Amit Kachhap
2020-09-02 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] kselftests/arm64: add PAuth tests Dave Martin
2020-09-03  9:46   ` Boyan Karatotev
2020-09-07 10:29     ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200902170052.GJ6642@arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=boian4o1@gmail.com \
    --cc=boyan.karatotev@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).