* [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access
@ 2020-09-02 10:37 Jonathan Zhou
2020-09-03 17:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-09-09 16:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Zhou @ 2020-09-02 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Mathieu Poirier, Suzuki K Poulose, lizixian, Shaokun Zhang,
Jonathan Zhou, Mike Leach
The TRCSEQEVR(3) is reserved, using '@nrseqstate - 1' instead to avoid
accessing the reserved register.
Fixes: f188b5e76aae ("coresight: etm4x: Save/restore state across CPU low power states")
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
Cc: lizixian@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Zhou <jonathan.zhouwen@huawei.com>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
index 96425e818fc2..44e44c817bf8 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
@@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int etm4_cpu_save(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
state->trcvdsacctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
state->trcvdarcctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
- for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
state->trcseqevr[i] = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
state->trcseqrstevr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQRSTEVR);
@@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ static void etm4_cpu_restore(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
writel_relaxed(state->trcvdsacctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
writel_relaxed(state->trcvdarcctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
- for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
writel_relaxed(state->trcseqevr[i],
drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access
2020-09-02 10:37 [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access Jonathan Zhou
@ 2020-09-03 17:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-09-07 16:51 ` Mike Leach
2020-09-09 16:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2020-09-03 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Zhou
Cc: Shaokun Zhang, lizixian, Mike Leach, linux-arm-kernel,
Suzuki K Poulose
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:37:13PM +0800, Jonathan Zhou wrote:
> The TRCSEQEVR(3) is reserved, using '@nrseqstate - 1' instead to avoid
> accessing the reserved register.
>
> Fixes: f188b5e76aae ("coresight: etm4x: Save/restore state across CPU low power states")
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
> Cc: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
> Cc: lizixian@hisilicon.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Zhou <jonathan.zhouwen@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> index 96425e818fc2..44e44c817bf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int etm4_cpu_save(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> state->trcvdsacctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> state->trcvdarcctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> state->trcseqevr[i] = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
The section 3.4.3 "Guidelines for trace unit registers to be saved and restored"
of the ETM4 Architecture Specification (ARM IHI0064F ID042818) is clear on the
fact that registers TRCSEQEVR0-3 have to be taken into account when saving the
trace unit state.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> state->trcseqrstevr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQRSTEVR);
> @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ static void etm4_cpu_restore(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> writel_relaxed(state->trcvdsacctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> writel_relaxed(state->trcvdarcctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> writel_relaxed(state->trcseqevr[i],
> drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
> --
> 1.9.1
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access
2020-09-03 17:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
@ 2020-09-07 16:51 ` Mike Leach
2020-09-08 1:39 ` Jonathan Zhou
2020-09-08 17:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mike Leach @ 2020-09-07 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Poirier
Cc: Shaokun Zhang, lizixian, linux-arm-kernel, Jonathan Zhou,
Suzuki K Poulose
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 18:42, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:37:13PM +0800, Jonathan Zhou wrote:
> > The TRCSEQEVR(3) is reserved, using '@nrseqstate - 1' instead to avoid
> > accessing the reserved register.
> >
> > Fixes: f188b5e76aae ("coresight: etm4x: Save/restore state across CPU low power states")
> > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> > Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
> > Cc: lizixian@hisilicon.com
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Zhou <jonathan.zhouwen@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > index 96425e818fc2..44e44c817bf8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int etm4_cpu_save(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> > state->trcvdsacctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> > state->trcvdarcctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> > + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> > state->trcseqevr[i] = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
>
> The section 3.4.3 "Guidelines for trace unit registers to be saved and restored"
> of the ETM4 Architecture Specification (ARM IHI0064F ID042818) is clear on the
> fact that registers TRCSEQEVR0-3 have to be taken into account when saving the
I think this is a typo in the TRM. I'll ping the docs people in ARM.
> trace unit state.
>
Looking @ the register descriptions for TRCSEQEVRn (7.3.63) in the
above document n=0-2.
The number of states is set by TRCIDR5.NUMSEQSTATE (7.3.35). This can
take the value 0 or 4.
If 4 then there are 3 TRCSEQEVR(n) registers - 0 to 2 - one for each
state transition.
Thus this patch is correct in using nrseqstate - 1.
Regards
Mike
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> >
> > state->trcseqrstevr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQRSTEVR);
> > @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ static void etm4_cpu_restore(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> > writel_relaxed(state->trcvdsacctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> > writel_relaxed(state->trcvdarcctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> > + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> > writel_relaxed(state->trcseqevr[i],
> > drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
--
Mike Leach
Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
Manchester Design Centre. UK
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access
2020-09-07 16:51 ` Mike Leach
@ 2020-09-08 1:39 ` Jonathan Zhou
2020-09-08 17:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Zhou @ 2020-09-08 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Leach, Mathieu Poirier
Cc: Shaokun Zhang, lizixian, linux-arm-kernel, Suzuki K Poulose
Hi Mike,
On 08/09/2020 00:51, Mike Leach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 18:42, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:37:13PM +0800, Jonathan Zhou wrote:
>>> The TRCSEQEVR(3) is reserved, using '@nrseqstate - 1' instead to avoid
>>> accessing the reserved register.
>>>
>>> Fixes: f188b5e76aae ("coresight: etm4x: Save/restore state across CPU low power states")
>>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
>>> Cc: lizixian@hisilicon.com
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Zhou <jonathan.zhouwen@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
>>> index 96425e818fc2..44e44c817bf8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
>>> @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int etm4_cpu_save(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>>> state->trcvdsacctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
>>> state->trcvdarcctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
>>>
>>> - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
>>> + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
>>> state->trcseqevr[i] = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
>>
>> The section 3.4.3 "Guidelines for trace unit registers to be saved and restored"
>> of the ETM4 Architecture Specification (ARM IHI0064F ID042818) is clear on the
>> fact that registers TRCSEQEVR0-3 have to be taken into account when saving the
>
> I think this is a typo in the TRM. I'll ping the docs people in ARM.
>
>> trace unit state.
>>
>
> Looking @ the register descriptions for TRCSEQEVRn (7.3.63) in the
> above document n=0-2.
> The number of states is set by TRCIDR5.NUMSEQSTATE (7.3.35). This can
> take the value 0 or 4.
> If 4 then there are 3 TRCSEQEVR(n) registers - 0 to 2 - one for each
> state transition.
>
> Thus this patch is correct in using nrseqstate - 1.
>
Thanks for point out this, I just never thought it may be a typo.
Regards
Jonathan
> Regards
>
> Mike
>
>> Thanks,
>> Mathieu
>>
>>>
>>> state->trcseqrstevr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQRSTEVR);
>>> @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ static void etm4_cpu_restore(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>>> writel_relaxed(state->trcvdsacctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
>>> writel_relaxed(state->trcvdarcctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
>>>
>>> - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
>>> + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
>>> writel_relaxed(state->trcseqevr[i],
>>> drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access
2020-09-07 16:51 ` Mike Leach
2020-09-08 1:39 ` Jonathan Zhou
@ 2020-09-08 17:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-09-09 9:41 ` Mike Leach
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2020-09-08 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Leach
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose, lizixian, Coresight ML, Shaokun Zhang,
Jonathan Zhou, linux-arm-kernel
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 10:52, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 18:42, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:37:13PM +0800, Jonathan Zhou wrote:
> > > The TRCSEQEVR(3) is reserved, using '@nrseqstate - 1' instead to avoid
> > > accessing the reserved register.
> > >
> > > Fixes: f188b5e76aae ("coresight: etm4x: Save/restore state across CPU low power states")
> > > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
> > > Cc: lizixian@hisilicon.com
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Zhou <jonathan.zhouwen@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > > index 96425e818fc2..44e44c817bf8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > > @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int etm4_cpu_save(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> > > state->trcvdsacctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> > > state->trcvdarcctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> > > + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> > > state->trcseqevr[i] = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
> >
> > The section 3.4.3 "Guidelines for trace unit registers to be saved and restored"
> > of the ETM4 Architecture Specification (ARM IHI0064F ID042818) is clear on the
> > fact that registers TRCSEQEVR0-3 have to be taken into account when saving the
>
> I think this is a typo in the TRM. I'll ping the docs people in ARM.
Did you get an answer from the document people? Is this really a
typographical problem?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> > trace unit state.
> >
>
> Looking @ the register descriptions for TRCSEQEVRn (7.3.63) in the
> above document n=0-2.
> The number of states is set by TRCIDR5.NUMSEQSTATE (7.3.35). This can
> take the value 0 or 4.
> If 4 then there are 3 TRCSEQEVR(n) registers - 0 to 2 - one for each
> state transition.
>
> Thus this patch is correct in using nrseqstate - 1.
>
> Regards
>
> Mike
>
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
> >
> > >
> > > state->trcseqrstevr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQRSTEVR);
> > > @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ static void etm4_cpu_restore(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> > > writel_relaxed(state->trcvdsacctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> > > writel_relaxed(state->trcvdarcctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> > > + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> > > writel_relaxed(state->trcseqevr[i],
> > > drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
> > > --
> > > 1.9.1
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Leach
> Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
> Manchester Design Centre. UK
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access
2020-09-08 17:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
@ 2020-09-09 9:41 ` Mike Leach
2020-09-09 16:32 ` Mathieu Poirier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mike Leach @ 2020-09-09 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Poirier
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose, lizixian, Coresight ML, Shaokun Zhang,
Jonathan Zhou, linux-arm-kernel
Hi Mathieu,
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 18:43, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 10:52, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 18:42, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:37:13PM +0800, Jonathan Zhou wrote:
> > > > The TRCSEQEVR(3) is reserved, using '@nrseqstate - 1' instead to avoid
> > > > accessing the reserved register.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: f188b5e76aae ("coresight: etm4x: Save/restore state across CPU low power states")
> > > > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> > > > Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
> > > > Cc: lizixian@hisilicon.com
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Zhou <jonathan.zhouwen@huawei.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > > > index 96425e818fc2..44e44c817bf8 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > > > @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int etm4_cpu_save(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> > > > state->trcvdsacctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> > > > state->trcvdarcctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
> > > >
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> > > > state->trcseqevr[i] = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
> > >
> > > The section 3.4.3 "Guidelines for trace unit registers to be saved and restored"
> > > of the ETM4 Architecture Specification (ARM IHI0064F ID042818) is clear on the
> > > fact that registers TRCSEQEVR0-3 have to be taken into account when saving the
> >
> > I think this is a typo in the TRM. I'll ping the docs people in ARM.
>
> Did you get an answer from the document people? Is this really a
> typographical problem?
>
Haven't had a reply, but this is a clear error. All other parts of the
spec, including programming the device and register descriptions give
a valid n=0-2 for TRCSEQEVRn.
TRCSEQEVR3 does not exist, and the assumed location is indeed
reserved. That said, reserved registers are marked as RES0H - so no
actual harm can come from reading / writing the register - but we
should be consistent.
I would regard section 3.4.3 as a list of registers to save / restore
as correct with the caveat - "should they exist in the
implementation". Quite a few of the register ranges defined in this
list show the maximum extent of registers where the actual number of
registers is implementation dependent.
Thanks
Mike
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> >
> > > trace unit state.
> > >
> >
> > Looking @ the register descriptions for TRCSEQEVRn (7.3.63) in the
> > above document n=0-2.
> > The number of states is set by TRCIDR5.NUMSEQSTATE (7.3.35). This can
> > take the value 0 or 4.
> > If 4 then there are 3 TRCSEQEVR(n) registers - 0 to 2 - one for each
> > state transition.
> >
> > Thus this patch is correct in using nrseqstate - 1.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mathieu
> > >
> > > >
> > > > state->trcseqrstevr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQRSTEVR);
> > > > @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ static void etm4_cpu_restore(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> > > > writel_relaxed(state->trcvdsacctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> > > > writel_relaxed(state->trcvdarcctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
> > > >
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> > > > writel_relaxed(state->trcseqevr[i],
> > > > drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
> > > > --
> > > > 1.9.1
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mike Leach
> > Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
> > Manchester Design Centre. UK
--
Mike Leach
Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
Manchester Design Centre. UK
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access
2020-09-09 9:41 ` Mike Leach
@ 2020-09-09 16:32 ` Mathieu Poirier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2020-09-09 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Leach
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose, lizixian, Coresight ML, Shaokun Zhang,
Jonathan Zhou, linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:41:27AM +0100, Mike Leach wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 18:43, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 10:52, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 18:42, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:37:13PM +0800, Jonathan Zhou wrote:
> > > > > The TRCSEQEVR(3) is reserved, using '@nrseqstate - 1' instead to avoid
> > > > > accessing the reserved register.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: f188b5e76aae ("coresight: etm4x: Save/restore state across CPU low power states")
> > > > > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> > > > > Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
> > > > > Cc: lizixian@hisilicon.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Zhou <jonathan.zhouwen@huawei.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > > > > index 96425e818fc2..44e44c817bf8 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> > > > > @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int etm4_cpu_save(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> > > > > state->trcvdsacctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> > > > > state->trcvdarcctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
> > > > >
> > > > > - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> > > > > + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> > > > > state->trcseqevr[i] = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
> > > >
> > > > The section 3.4.3 "Guidelines for trace unit registers to be saved and restored"
> > > > of the ETM4 Architecture Specification (ARM IHI0064F ID042818) is clear on the
> > > > fact that registers TRCSEQEVR0-3 have to be taken into account when saving the
> > >
> > > I think this is a typo in the TRM. I'll ping the docs people in ARM.
> >
> > Did you get an answer from the document people? Is this really a
> > typographical problem?
> >
>
> Haven't had a reply, but this is a clear error. All other parts of the
> spec, including programming the device and register descriptions give
> a valid n=0-2 for TRCSEQEVRn.
> TRCSEQEVR3 does not exist, and the assumed location is indeed
> reserved. That said, reserved registers are marked as RES0H - so no
> actual harm can come from reading / writing the register - but we
> should be consistent.
>
> I would regard section 3.4.3 as a list of registers to save / restore
> as correct with the caveat - "should they exist in the
> implementation". Quite a few of the register ranges defined in this
> list show the maximum extent of registers where the actual number of
> registers is implementation dependent.
Very well - I will proceed with this patch.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
> >
> > >
> > > > trace unit state.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Looking @ the register descriptions for TRCSEQEVRn (7.3.63) in the
> > > above document n=0-2.
> > > The number of states is set by TRCIDR5.NUMSEQSTATE (7.3.35). This can
> > > take the value 0 or 4.
> > > If 4 then there are 3 TRCSEQEVR(n) registers - 0 to 2 - one for each
> > > state transition.
> > >
> > > Thus this patch is correct in using nrseqstate - 1.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Mathieu
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > state->trcseqrstevr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQRSTEVR);
> > > > > @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ static void etm4_cpu_restore(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> > > > > writel_relaxed(state->trcvdsacctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> > > > > writel_relaxed(state->trcvdarcctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
> > > > >
> > > > > - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> > > > > + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> > > > > writel_relaxed(state->trcseqevr[i],
> > > > > drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.9.1
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Leach
> > > Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
> > > Manchester Design Centre. UK
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Leach
> Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
> Manchester Design Centre. UK
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access
2020-09-02 10:37 [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access Jonathan Zhou
2020-09-03 17:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
@ 2020-09-09 16:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2020-09-09 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Zhou
Cc: Shaokun Zhang, lizixian, Mike Leach, linux-arm-kernel,
Suzuki K Poulose
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:37:13PM +0800, Jonathan Zhou wrote:
> The TRCSEQEVR(3) is reserved, using '@nrseqstate - 1' instead to avoid
> accessing the reserved register.
>
> Fixes: f188b5e76aae ("coresight: etm4x: Save/restore state across CPU low power states")
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
> Cc: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
> Cc: lizixian@hisilicon.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Zhou <jonathan.zhouwen@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I have applied this patch.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> index 96425e818fc2..44e44c817bf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int etm4_cpu_save(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> state->trcvdsacctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> state->trcvdarcctlr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> state->trcseqevr[i] = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
>
> state->trcseqrstevr = readl(drvdata->base + TRCSEQRSTEVR);
> @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ static void etm4_cpu_restore(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> writel_relaxed(state->trcvdsacctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDSACCTLR);
> writel_relaxed(state->trcvdarcctlr, drvdata->base + TRCVDARCCTLR);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nrseqstate - 1; i++)
> writel_relaxed(state->trcseqevr[i],
> drvdata->base + TRCSEQEVRn(i));
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-09 16:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-02 10:37 [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: fix issues on trcseqevr access Jonathan Zhou
2020-09-03 17:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-09-07 16:51 ` Mike Leach
2020-09-08 1:39 ` Jonathan Zhou
2020-09-08 17:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-09-09 9:41 ` Mike Leach
2020-09-09 16:32 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-09-09 16:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).