From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcherian@marvell.com,
guohanjun@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: PCI: fix memleak when calling pci_iomap/unmap()
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:45:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200907104546.GC26513@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200905024811.74701-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 10:48:11AM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> index 1006ed2d7c604..ddfa1c53def48 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -217,4 +217,9 @@ void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
> }
>
> +void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *addr)
> +{
> + iounmap(addr);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iounmap);
So, what's wrong with the generic pci_iounmap() implementation?
Shouldn't it call iounmap() already?
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-07 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-05 2:48 [PATCH] arm64: PCI: fix memleak when calling pci_iomap/unmap() Yang Yingliang
2020-09-07 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
[not found] ` <BYAPR18MB267959E6FE4BEF38D0A4611EC5280@BYAPR18MB2679.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
2020-09-07 11:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-09 11:36 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-09 13:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-09 17:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-11 9:51 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200907104546.GC26513@gaia \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).