From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F08C43461 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD00420768 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ZZmdKeA9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AD00420768 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=qLkmAaDHMNeTGz/j71IK+6OT6Xvks/SwuOSu5+Tvf7k=; b=ZZmdKeA9PPnb0i13eI3DSfCyr Q4CSyONVGagA0Lbzz8G6SYAzADO+aIdz5cQ6Hh4nTvTpxalH0rv/LhScVoHYJDghASN/qwS/kOjHM Xc7NN3QcLIYYVK5IOsRKTTox7Q2fIl4apKOhp0xA79HmZ8n5xgtsE+WRo3jDbxGGJqUoGhY4esIUy fCS4psioAMAV8n/AjCqL+3NLuafSZCthvYulC/tz6934EGur40Gea+AH/0STvQFbvqKX6soiisvTF g8DTn2VpEw949d1FAqFj2nO+8vOkMjOWAaInp9EEBqKi9467nxdY2q6GQJyaaeL343gffuzweYPnd D5Za2iRPA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kFEep-0001Jd-8N; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:45:55 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kFEen-0001J2-8g for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:45:54 +0000 Received: from gaia (unknown [46.69.195.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0766520768; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:45:47 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Yang Yingliang Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: PCI: fix memleak when calling pci_iomap/unmap() Message-ID: <20200907104546.GC26513@gaia> References: <20200905024811.74701-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200905024811.74701-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200907_064553_421567_15AE24D7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.59 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcherian@marvell.com, guohanjun@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 10:48:11AM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > index 1006ed2d7c604..ddfa1c53def48 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > @@ -217,4 +217,9 @@ void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus); > } > > +void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *addr) > +{ > + iounmap(addr); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iounmap); So, what's wrong with the generic pci_iounmap() implementation? Shouldn't it call iounmap() already? -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel