linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"guohanjun@huawei.com" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: PCI: fix memleak when calling pci_iomap/unmap()
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:21:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200907112118.GD26513@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR18MB267959E6FE4BEF38D0A4611EC5280@BYAPR18MB2679.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>

+ Lorenzo

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:51:21AM +0000, George Cherian wrote:
> Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 10:48:11AM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c index
> > > 1006ed2d7c604..ddfa1c53def48 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > > @@ -217,4 +217,9 @@ void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > >  	acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *addr) {
> > > +	iounmap(addr);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iounmap);
> > 
> > So, what's wrong with the generic pci_iounmap() implementation?
> > Shouldn't it call iounmap() already?
> 
> Since ARM64 selects CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP and not
> CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP,  the pci_iounmap function is reduced to a NULL
> function. Due to this, even the managed release variants or even the explicit
> pci_iounmap calls doesn't really remove the mappings leading to leak.

Ah, I missed the fact that pci_iounmap() depends on a different
config option.

> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/20/28

So is this going to be fixed in the generic code? That would be my
preference.

A problem with the iounmap() in the proposed patch is that the region
may have been an I/O port, so we could end up unmapping the I/O space.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-07 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-05  2:48 [PATCH] arm64: PCI: fix memleak when calling pci_iomap/unmap() Yang Yingliang
2020-09-07 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
     [not found]   ` <BYAPR18MB267959E6FE4BEF38D0A4611EC5280@BYAPR18MB2679.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
2020-09-07 11:21     ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2020-09-09 11:36       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-09 13:54         ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-09 17:37           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-11  9:51           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200907112118.GD26513@gaia \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).