From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978AEC433E2 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06CFA2078B for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="kr2gqP16" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 06CFA2078B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=lyM5oamFW+a/I2BLf5CVZPWIATTI5qHm7JRFoVpYPjg=; b=kr2gqP169MeB1skwrHOXrmYGy ip0+AVcxkWIbWx7FseOjaoqvELOxXsg/dPF/hvPmt/+BbQZJTFVO+G2q6xyYijJt9BJOKlSaXtnhu yAmtMmGW43b0GqIwUe3Z3phenAw3x9N+cFhNCuZEKW75ks5X82fj7JNnS8KPgW+rNzrRY/5FJtcqQ Oik+t/sp0gDPMrJH+K+DRxb/Y+DmzmpylGt+2cyM7LFgF406bTMyuIDsQLPZwxgNhin5GCVt7Al+z B8kR2AB2sPc9eNf9bt3QI3wysFVJgKeVFZOw8yF+7Q5PGyDxKNkg6bhzHBfIylXVmoqSMfGfVQ7EF zKZk5gcRw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kFGV3-0003ec-EE; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:43:57 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kFGV0-0003e8-Jr for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:43:55 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD541045; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 05:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.10.112]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 212113F66E; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 05:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:43:44 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Enable building SCMI as module Message-ID: <20200907124343.GA11982@bogus> References: <20200907112920.34275-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200907112920.34275-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200907_084354_702673_1C4654C6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.09 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mikhail Golubev , Peter Hilber , Igor Skalkin , Cristian Marussi , Anton Yakovlev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:29:17PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi, > > Though it was initially developed as module, so some reason(I can't > recollect why apart from some structuring arounf the way bus and > protocols were initialised), it was merged as a built-in only driver. > > Now, there is a need to build this as modules. This is mainly needed > by virtio transport. This also aligns well with GKI modularisation > efforts. > I forgot to add another patch [1] which was in my tree when I tested this and completely forgot about the dependency. -- Regards, Sudeep [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20200829170923.29949-5-sudeep.holla@arm.com _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel