From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
graf@amazon.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: Refactor PMU attribute error handling
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:58:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908075830.1161921-2-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908075830.1161921-1-maz@kernel.org>
The PMU emulation error handling is pretty messy when dealing with
attributes. Let's refactor it so that we have less duplication,
and that it is easy to extend later on.
A functional change is that kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init() used to return
-ENXIO when the PMU feature wasn't set. The error is now reported
as -ENODEV, matching the documentation. -ENXIO is still returned
when the interrupt isn't properly configured.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index f0d0312c0a55..93d797df42c6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -735,15 +735,6 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
- return -ENODEV;
-
- if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
- return -ENXIO;
-
- if (vcpu->arch.pmu.created)
- return -EBUSY;
-
if (irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) {
int ret;
@@ -796,6 +787,15 @@ static bool pmu_irq_is_valid(struct kvm *kvm, int irq)
int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
{
+ if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (vcpu->arch.pmu.created)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
switch (attr->attr) {
case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
@@ -804,9 +804,6 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))
return -EINVAL;
- if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
- return -ENODEV;
-
if (get_user(irq, uaddr))
return -EFAULT;
--
2.28.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-08 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-08 7:58 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: Filtering PMU events Marc Zyngier
2020-09-08 7:58 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-09-08 9:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: Refactor PMU attribute error handling Andrew Jones
2020-09-08 10:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-09-08 7:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: arm64: Use event mask matching architecture revision Marc Zyngier
2020-09-08 10:02 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-09 9:38 ` Auger Eric
2020-09-09 9:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-09-09 9:58 ` Auger Eric
2020-09-08 7:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: Add PMU event filtering infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2020-09-08 10:15 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-09 17:14 ` Auger Eric
2020-09-08 7:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: Mask out filtered events in PCMEID{0, 1}_EL1 Marc Zyngier
2020-09-09 17:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: Mask out filtered events in PCMEID{0,1}_EL1 Auger Eric
2020-09-09 17:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-09-09 18:07 ` Auger Eric
2020-09-08 7:58 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: Document PMU filtering API Marc Zyngier
2020-09-08 10:28 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-09 17:47 ` Auger Eric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200908075830.1161921-2-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).