linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of S1PTW
@ 2020-09-15 10:42 Marc Zyngier
  2020-09-15 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: Assume write fault on S1PTW permission fault on instruction fetch Marc Zyngier
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2020-09-15 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel; +Cc: Will Deacon, kernel-team

I recently managed to trigger an interesting failure mode, where a
guest would be stuck on an instruction abort due to a permission
fault. Interestingly enough, this IABT had S1PTW set in the ESR,
indicating that it was trying to *write* to the PT. We fix it by
adding the execute permission (it's an IABT, after all...), and going
nowhere fast.

Note that it can only happen on a system that can perform automatic
updates of the page table flags.

This small series fixes the issue by revamping the S1PTW handling in
the context of execution faults. The first patch fixes the bug, and is
definitely a stable candidate. The second patch is merely a cleanup,
which can wait.

Tested on an A55-based board.

* From v1:
  - Rename kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw() to kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw()
  - Don't overload kvm_vcpu_trap_is_iabt()
  - Introduce kvm_vcpu_trap_is_exec_fault()

Marc Zyngier (2):
  KVM: arm64: Assume write fault on S1PTW permission fault on
    instruction fetch
  KVM: arm64: Remove S1PTW check from kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite()

 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h    | 14 +++++++++++---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c                    |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.28.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: Assume write fault on S1PTW permission fault on instruction fetch
  2020-09-15 10:42 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of S1PTW Marc Zyngier
@ 2020-09-15 10:42 ` Marc Zyngier
  2020-09-15 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: Remove S1PTW check from kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite() Marc Zyngier
  2020-09-18 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of S1PTW Will Deacon
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2020-09-15 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel; +Cc: Will Deacon, kernel-team, stable

KVM currently assumes that an instruction abort can never be a write.
This is in general true, except when the abort is triggered by
a S1PTW on instruction fetch that tries to update the S1 page tables
(to set AF, for example).

This can happen if the page tables have been paged out and brought
back in without seeing a direct write to them (they are thus marked
read only), and the fault handling code will make the PT executable(!)
instead of writable. The guest gets stuck forever.

In these conditions, the permission fault must be considered as
a write so that the Stage-1 update can take place. This is essentially
the I-side equivalent of the problem fixed by 60e21a0ef54c ("arm64: KVM:
Take S1 walks into account when determining S2 write faults").

Update kvm_is_write_fault() to return true on IABT+S1PTW, and introduce
kvm_vcpu_trap_is_exec_fault() that only return true when no faulting
on a S1 fault. Additionally, kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw() is renamed to
kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw(), as the above makes it plain that it isn't
specific to data abort.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h    | 12 ++++++++++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c                    |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 49a55be2b9a2..4f618af660ba 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static __always_inline int kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return (kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_SRT_MASK) >> ESR_ELx_SRT_SHIFT;
 }
 
-static __always_inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static __always_inline bool kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_S1PTW);
 }
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 static __always_inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WNR) ||
-		kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(vcpu); /* AF/DBM update */
+		kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw(vcpu); /* AF/DBM update */
 }
 
 static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_is_cm(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -335,6 +335,11 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_trap_is_iabt(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW;
 }
 
+static inline bool kvm_vcpu_trap_is_exec_fault(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return kvm_vcpu_trap_is_iabt(vcpu) && !kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw(vcpu);
+}
+
 static __always_inline u8 kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_FSC;
@@ -372,6 +377,9 @@ static __always_inline int kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 static inline bool kvm_is_write_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	if (kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw(vcpu))
+		return true;
+
 	if (kvm_vcpu_trap_is_iabt(vcpu))
 		return false;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index 426ef65601dd..d64c5d56c860 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static inline bool fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 			kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault_type(vcpu) == FSC_FAULT &&
 			kvm_vcpu_dabt_isvalid(vcpu) &&
 			!kvm_vcpu_abt_issea(vcpu) &&
-			!kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(vcpu);
+			!kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw(vcpu);
 
 		if (valid) {
 			int ret = __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index f58d657a898d..9aec1ce491d2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
 	struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = vcpu->arch.hw_mmu;
 
 	write_fault = kvm_is_write_fault(vcpu);
-	exec_fault = kvm_vcpu_trap_is_iabt(vcpu);
+	exec_fault = kvm_vcpu_trap_is_exec_fault(vcpu);
 	VM_BUG_ON(write_fault && exec_fault);
 
 	if (fault_status == FSC_PERM && !write_fault && !exec_fault) {
@@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(vcpu)) {
+		if (kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw(vcpu)) {
 			kvm_inject_dabt(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_get_hfar(vcpu));
 			ret = 1;
 			goto out_unlock;
-- 
2.28.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: Remove S1PTW check from kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite()
  2020-09-15 10:42 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of S1PTW Marc Zyngier
  2020-09-15 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: Assume write fault on S1PTW permission fault on instruction fetch Marc Zyngier
@ 2020-09-15 10:42 ` Marc Zyngier
  2020-09-18 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of S1PTW Will Deacon
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2020-09-15 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel; +Cc: Will Deacon, kernel-team

Now that kvm_vcpu_trap_is_write_fault() checks for S1PTW, there
is no need for kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite() to do the same thing, as
we already check for this condition on all existing paths.

Drop the check and add a comment instead.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 4f618af660ba..1cc5f5f72d0b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -303,10 +303,10 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_S1PTW);
 }
 
+/* Always check for S1PTW *before* using this. */
 static __always_inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WNR) ||
-		kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw(vcpu); /* AF/DBM update */
+	return kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WNR;
 }
 
 static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_is_cm(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-- 
2.28.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of S1PTW
  2020-09-15 10:42 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of S1PTW Marc Zyngier
  2020-09-15 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: Assume write fault on S1PTW permission fault on instruction fetch Marc Zyngier
  2020-09-15 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: Remove S1PTW check from kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite() Marc Zyngier
@ 2020-09-18 13:37 ` Will Deacon
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2020-09-18 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, kernel-team, kvmarm, kvm

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:42:16AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> I recently managed to trigger an interesting failure mode, where a
> guest would be stuck on an instruction abort due to a permission
> fault. Interestingly enough, this IABT had S1PTW set in the ESR,
> indicating that it was trying to *write* to the PT. We fix it by
> adding the execute permission (it's an IABT, after all...), and going
> nowhere fast.
> 
> Note that it can only happen on a system that can perform automatic
> updates of the page table flags.
> 
> This small series fixes the issue by revamping the S1PTW handling in
> the context of execution faults. The first patch fixes the bug, and is
> definitely a stable candidate. The second patch is merely a cleanup,
> which can wait.
> 
> Tested on an A55-based board.
> 
> * From v1:
>   - Rename kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw() to kvm_vcpu_abt_iss1tw()
>   - Don't overload kvm_vcpu_trap_is_iabt()
>   - Introduce kvm_vcpu_trap_is_exec_fault()

For both patches:

Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Cheers,

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-18 13:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-15 10:42 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of S1PTW Marc Zyngier
2020-09-15 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: Assume write fault on S1PTW permission fault on instruction fetch Marc Zyngier
2020-09-15 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: Remove S1PTW check from kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite() Marc Zyngier
2020-09-18 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of S1PTW Will Deacon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).