From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA928C43461 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81B5522274 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="kEqi1nNg"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="tjryK8s0" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 81B5522274 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Q5g364r9yxjw4cjcUYXgdblFKIaXd9yPQTJmcGv0fpE=; b=kEqi1nNgKXfpGuiEVfmrlSqUR Fl/bsZR9JZBSonGCsmZVypvKGwDck39kbPpHrISRf/EPoTbEFj3HYluSA3yUEhWWIrvRPobE32Ms7 IOpxjxGBu7vbK2p+cN+ZnsgZDRWYu1S1XwZ/d52s5OmNY0Qvy+Y+9HloSI+/T/RfBPs1P34zXmyEv uEe+SUDyeb36lXbWfIU3Hehk6hL+OPEuQ/qEN+uAH2avcQ7j3p4lAiTTo9S50GcI+RCtpi4a3wMzp Q6LsrHMhnRL2nijQgkxr+9EoNZWgVi99sy3P/OIwj3zjLxaGUekdGeb+JAbK+sFR7xvYi6F2PajxB gXu/QDjMQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIXJN-00048h-A1; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:17:25 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::343]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIXJK-00048G-Kg for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:17:23 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id a9so3003506wmm.2 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 06:17:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HYDGktxm5Yk9Jc3ILH+B9gt66sMh0wgrn23SbZ7R4kg=; b=tjryK8s0CUqs3kovVGVx+IXeKZCQBuHIBzYbxKssEuOfWAmunncudTXIsNk0wVmDgD 8ECYqhSLGrmhzcOJKGWqb3AvzQmVoXXr1oahpyMoDnSKeODjHmQBxSEDQa1FOpFoMNAw cReUomjwPtgNPST8bh1MGsbfkbjHkwysi85sreirEDS6ZoFBBb38GCNUg1hzinT0suhM AwgoUmns6X3G9id4xFydV8NyppVGeVZJdHvvUp7gw9hkWPK9umHBDNlxmszmTT+RimNd A+QxU8CeznkX3zKc0YUMU0HK4u3KGMCMEcSt3OffGjBHvlRLofDQUuKxPb3KDV7Tseaw pWQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HYDGktxm5Yk9Jc3ILH+B9gt66sMh0wgrn23SbZ7R4kg=; b=RZ55Z/RMJUHlvg+OS1Qs+0mVx0Gkb8BR7qWKdSYzqpTUHan89Gn8Gpp+w7bE44bHj1 tlHHEvMtaAVKGFjtxXmKXvGumo+sFt3DfdOEcj0gjVzo2DNBrpNBqDlVNXh8qukKHWtu cduI2f4ExzUIs6RHVp5h8alrry11xGtopdo5u8WmE5ipFg+qXzV4eMDTRsVEhuocTq9O FCLOFSDHUaYjpp2co0soKdWVA5QRG0DPXdXKdQOv2NQzUw8G7g+hu7Zf38qg9rSrMZpE SFHBYWucEH86GIn9z5FjRG5Hpb5mq35uvl9R/yLJVIhjCbAYHHzv2ZWLBWKtVSpGQHzT 5I8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53007czeaPi3Ak7ubSZAHIaxJ37LAerqbIMRtPHRHW2zjORlJPPw rjKKSakmPmN3CDALvohGK+uOew== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8U4yEfYF7c9LM4YlgMc/Is2k63uF9wauRkwth16t0jTMXEnEugF/Na7HedGEh7Idj2lypcA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c906:: with SMTP id f6mr4972209wmb.9.1600262241258; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 06:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myrica ([2001:1715:4e26:a7e0:116c:c27a:3e7f:5eaf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j14sm34538837wrr.66.2020.09.16.06.17.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 06:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:17:02 +0200 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker To: Yauheni Kaliuta Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: bpf: Fix branch offset in JIT Message-ID: <20200916131702.GB5316@myrica> References: <20200914160355.19179-1-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org> <20200915131102.GA26439@willie-the-truck> <20200915135344.GA113966@apalos.home> <20200915141707.GB26439@willie-the-truck> <20200915192311.GA124360@apalos.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200916_091722_962995_7EECB6C6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.40 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Zi Shen Lim , Alexei Starovoitov , Will Deacon , ardb@kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, John Fastabend , Catalin Marinas , Jakub Kicinski , Andrii Nakryiko , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ilias Apalodimas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau , Jiri Olsa , bpf@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:39:37PM +0300, Yauheni Kaliuta wrote: > If you start to amend extables, could you consider a change like > > 05a68e892e89 ("s390/kernel: expand exception table logic to allow new handling options") > > and implementation of BPF_PROBE_MEM then? Commit 800834285361 ("bpf, arm64: Add BPF exception tables") should have taken care of that, no? Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel