From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A6DC43463 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A12EA207D3 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="qSwS4vD1"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="TU8gswju" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A12EA207D3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=2t/fLVmySYRm9J+daXocWCQZY7YnkYWbqfEYzYOnepI=; b=qSwS4vD1gx/JpRXxRL/ecrhWJ WSJtztiqBMkjzOD+7tpCcIiqCYd6K5wOYcUirOgfQ+47DzHeX3OX1vZDng0WzlkqrmEwaSQ5u8T9D v2IG43hdzVl9c1TmSNNW+sp4jjmgBYmuFzaphwYbDoQCiKHAJAOTeBf39aeyyCK0aDTKkHnNS9t3B SEUd216acpbuUyKW4/wKlHNyZXvbb2mT/y3J1xY798gRSv60SZXC1nI0JCjPhrZ1iqr2jhU6YzS4i WhFevFAHIdpOXa2y+2MDDdzdJvqlXfalJT/gJEAdFiMNvuAaHVA8Kd8o0jAq/4ujJh1sMBb6a4pvm c8b4xHXXQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kK4vO-000314-Hj; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:23:02 +0000 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kK4vN-00030w-5u for linux-arm-kernel@merlin.infradead.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:23:01 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=M9C+xMteCLmxjuhFVA61FIZoHdpfMD5Lc3Ug+y14apc=; b=TU8gswjuXpvm/MyBSJB1vaOTwg 7CcQFeWPYOwW6PYXhvCpp0vzvWldb70TKuwk6v9nWcowTGn2VYxRj0sbzAeS1dOPc7tVJZV69Nc6Y Oye5Ac32YDMVeUtWbcgDk6Lqhz34cgGhYuiR2uTx7CyOyrh4ejW/zOiv0nLMgTDXz/4QksW+LarsO UKo48ovg6z43+egEg49LBUL7Qb1BK2+QYQXYWWRv+ZaoBr++1zvkvXaDBQNH/ENPEz9dpyIhUnPg/ RMo/EthNeTct23dRta9OEBgDELlkG8IIvv6XkLyXzRfFWLEelnomJhQf946LaXKaS04BIvNdWa7Hj bCj2UmxA==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kK4vL-0001qh-MM; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:22:59 +0000 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 20:22:59 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] kernel: add a PF_FORCE_COMPAT flag Message-ID: <20200920192259.GU32101@casper.infradead.org> References: <20200918124533.3487701-1-hch@lst.de> <20200918124533.3487701-2-hch@lst.de> <20200920151510.GS32101@casper.infradead.org> <20200920180742.GN3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200920190159.GT32101@casper.infradead.org> <20200920191031.GQ3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200920191031.GQ3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , linux-mm@kvack.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jens Axboe , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 08:10:31PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > IMO it's much saner to mark those and refuse to touch them from io_uring... Simpler solution is to remove io_uring from the 32-bit syscall list. If you're a 32-bit process, you don't get to use io_uring. Would any real users actually care about that? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel