From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A33DC2D0E2 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3D0E2073A for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="kyHXrYF7" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E3D0E2073A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=BRQVpzaGQWy0NrdoKDW4HvewIk8DrQrVyQ7Lw9cA3PM=; b=kyHXrYF74pIxx6PjKqTOGSYj5 N0NTBTCX6S3E4qn3Py/VAUMZcbw3MVAoYxnCj3/qCUVJr7YsTYFjqcKfJpc1hWQtyXzSQRHuO9pBr rvVgcY5lGkqNxeiSYIjLYERPDCabcyRmkimPCDrPjBsbYGH4aoeIPnHJx8b2cG5A9W0C2v9XjUUsc b7JOpc9KSf8c3ZJVhLeVJL2KJpp9Sc5cKdOAMND29Nas3Cten4RRJKkHz52VZVhe3UGs9oBr6bENy k+/3cUiXM1WzzHlxNVQ3EaKm/5KP+qlFqwNVZIMHeTPj9L8oLmDZUQoTZ7li5tWzyIK2CkxVLNhXb P66EAYEEw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kKfjo-0005fQ-5i; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:41:32 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kKfjl-0005es-CT for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:41:30 +0000 Received: from gaia (unknown [31.124.44.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08CC52073A; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:41:24 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Amit Daniel Kachhap Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] kselftest/arm64: Check mte tagged user address in kernel Message-ID: <20200922104123.GF15643@gaia> References: <20200901092719.9918-1-amit.kachhap@arm.com> <20200901092719.9918-7-amit.kachhap@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200901092719.9918-7-amit.kachhap@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200922_064129_568692_1E3E5EAA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.33 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Vincenzo Frascino , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:57:19PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > Add a testcase to check that user address with valid/invalid > mte tag works in kernel mode. This test verifies the kernel API's > __arch_copy_from_user/__arch_copy_to_user works by considering > if the user pointer has valid/invalid allocation tags. > > In MTE sync mode a SIGSEV fault is generated if a user memory > with invalid tag is accessed in kernel. In async mode no such > fault occurs. We don't generate a SIGSEGV for faults in the uaccess routines. The kernel simply returns less copied bytes than what was requested or -1 and setting errno. BTW, Qemu has a bug and it reports the wrong exception class (lower DABT) for a tag check fault while in the uaccess routines, leading to kernel panic (bad mode in synchronous abort handler). > +static int check_usermem_access_fault(int mem_type, int mode, int mapping) > +{ > + int fd, ret, i, err; > + char val = 'A'; > + size_t len, read_len; > + void *ptr, *ptr_next; > + bool fault; > + > + len = 2 * page_sz; > + err = KSFT_FAIL; > + /* > + * Accessing user memory in kernel with invalid tag should fault in sync > + * mode but may not fault in async mode as per the implemented MTE > + * support in Arm64 kernel. > + */ > + if (mode == MTE_ASYNC_ERR) > + fault = false; > + else > + fault = true; > + mte_switch_mode(mode, MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG); > + fd = create_temp_file(); > + if (fd == -1) > + return KSFT_FAIL; > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > + write(fd, &val, sizeof(val)); > + lseek(fd, 0, 0); > + ptr = mte_allocate_memory(len, mem_type, mapping, true); > + if (check_allocated_memory(ptr, len, mem_type, true) != KSFT_PASS) { > + close(fd); > + return KSFT_FAIL; > + } > + mte_initialize_current_context(mode, (uintptr_t)ptr, len); > + /* Copy from file into buffer with valid tag */ > + read_len = read(fd, ptr, len); > + ret = errno; My reading of the man page is that errno is set only if read() returns -1. > + mte_wait_after_trig(); > + if ((cur_mte_cxt.fault_valid == true) || ret == EFAULT || read_len < len) > + goto usermem_acc_err; > + /* Verify same pattern is read */ > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > + if (*(char *)(ptr + i) != val) > + break; > + if (i < len) > + goto usermem_acc_err; > + > + /* Tag the next half of memory with different value */ > + ptr_next = (void *)((unsigned long)ptr + page_sz); > + ptr_next = mte_insert_tags(ptr_next, page_sz); > + if (!ptr_next) > + goto usermem_acc_err; > + lseek(fd, 0, 0); > + /* Copy from file into buffer with invalid tag */ > + read_len = read(fd, ptr, len); > + ret = errno; > + mte_wait_after_trig(); > + if ((fault == true) && Nitpick: just use "if (fault &&), it's a bool already. > + (cur_mte_cxt.fault_valid == true || ret == EFAULT || read_len < len)) { > + err = KSFT_PASS; > + } else if ((fault == false) && > + (cur_mte_cxt.fault_valid == false && read_len == len)) { Same here, !fault, !cur_mte_cxt.fault_valid. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel