From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47160C4727D for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6AD12399A for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="IbbCgtM7"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="iTJtSWmq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D6AD12399A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=RsQ6FXYuSDO6xy9JzYqvKuCX29woRj0zv4vszeEodAA=; b=IbbCgtM7711mNnaGCKCPtXcJw KgZiHz68DUbuUp2Pbk4ZpF829YHbhrVyHr3dK8i4MkzhCpSj0uVYWkClAiBgVCyD0Bi+UhOPEpB9/ Wo4K8RXGAg38va0XdhX700Cu2OJQclAy1T0MAm6+omQa8sY8UMQiTDhgP8NNwr4cBscBL5/mhJsa1 KZMMx2dxxb4egzASy+UfRGuyy0ubmN8aMyA0XeOSftu5Pl7IG+i6G+KknfOT2dTUrA+M8rM1l2JlC mozCayXmOmzyWH0IS5wu2zLp5l4WBwWtiSzsoULCSYai68mG9Cb6VCden+9sS9vxy/5C7UF0mYufl vDnjPxd+Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kLOGL-0003So-9L; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:14:05 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kLOGH-0003Qh-GA for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:14:02 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id z4so3177011wrr.4 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:13:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=kU3gnCMAsP2x/I5wCXT3/EKvoa/BON3ipEwTyPLZ/Ks=; b=iTJtSWmqJeU7llzv/rf2LzC0rJBnUIQYVHMUsA9Kd7kAivrPBT6K63Fi8f1slMi4nY EI76gDzdH6EXcJlD5LjQK0rmrKM4gjNPwEzpVa7ChVezK11LJd4bepFr6iALMv7J0cci SInOhF7PIAlVDnDrTmwd8hCE0kQRjfGXAL0bNg49k6BkYdBU4ynxjOqqUDxKlde5c/W2 8Hs6RaSL6YO2t6K66sqH2zb+Ez8PBhPsK2cktrU7DJcUqL5ZVBSNaRXKOWn46As6PFBJ 0JuecfRbRsz9JimHA4i8en4uCflh9w9eY25JOJ1yAn+gRrHUkb9+un2RBh6x+EXPh3ln cz2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=kU3gnCMAsP2x/I5wCXT3/EKvoa/BON3ipEwTyPLZ/Ks=; b=mrQvHrl76WKIjaj9FDMYc5gbWIarQ3vAvRWGdvSTzI5KdsvXuPyB9e50PuCcYBFzQ7 WCSA2wh62WkVGJpPH/6zgcG/UIRgpoFZhNhALopyHQ62+nbt2poTEyI+IOpP+E8t3OSB Fw8Deli8z3lMDAqmKmDMdBDsZ7Cn+V0HRkA+lnT0UcwRNAUGV17+zMyhAOmZ93ZnrsdE 1LOkSD3yIm/6vYzFEecMHQqfemeSPhUMo7mTkW+5YauSlQ/HnqCVuCRPCFWX5WY2DXqO aMBvbJcpMuQnEFr3iEaduU9c2JBZhX535BPby2YAiHq/EvQYeai2k0zz+frARMAvpy/o uFWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gVSoUQhGk7+BnHPItEDTWpbusAyinIrfsRgmYFkWGDBv6gWy0 MPRf35cGNpmtUIdcs0D+LqkDJg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwvyDtM5EY9cTKbSmfCPd8Ndctc7U1hxoVNhC0cIf/mU53M9YuULxQk3Bj1qzclp1sb8T/Iw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:cd0e:: with SMTP id w14mr4708454wrm.0.1600942438754; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myrica ([2001:1715:4e26:a7e0:116c:c27a:3e7f:5eaf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x16sm2948499wrq.62.2020.09.24.03.13.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:13:40 +0200 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Check for SVA features Message-ID: <20200924101340.GC170808@myrica> References: <20200918101852.582559-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200918101852.582559-11-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <753bcd76c21c4ea98ef1d4e492db01f4@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <753bcd76c21c4ea98ef1d4e492db01f4@huawei.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200924_061401_677841_C45BF428 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.51 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "fenghua.yu@intel.com" , "will@kernel.org" , Suzuki K Poulose , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Shameer, On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 08:59:39AM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > > +bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) > > +{ > > + unsigned long reg, fld; > > + unsigned long oas; > > + unsigned long asid_bits; > > + u32 feat_mask = ARM_SMMU_FEAT_BTM | > > ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY; > > Why is BTM mandated for SVA? I couldn't find this requirement in SMMU spec > (Sorry if I missed it or this got discussed earlier). But if performance is the only concern here, > is it better just to allow it with a warning rather than limiting SMMUs without BTM? It's a performance concern and requires to support multiple configurations, but the spec allows it. Are there SMMUs without BTM that need it? Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel