From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00B0C2D0A8 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6539820789 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="b6AXV/tt" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6539820789 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=o0X97eLvxAM3fiYUPZnNQsfU4H+GpMeNFhK4OmQ7iQg=; b=b6AXV/ttgoHkuFEZYNT6UI8Xo Htd1qitxypQ3Hzna1m/XfMIaPL2Kc1kHBzZzZ+uydn2EQa+z2buJe7OLRuSXOR2PRQVqlUgVOQUhR TcgfKTxvKQPdOWh6pILTawCMJX134sTL3ZnvtfLi4awdSuSyyUyYsB5PWqflsvogfVriH+qF9OM79 Kt2z/KqSGx1YdaeASzt6riU/ecpRed2kPtG4abt4XxxrCxEXeBQlPqpCECQVv12hFxhIO07rblMQt X3KnbGBzVxP9cf4Z0MrOgNOEn3j2Qk3Eh2JxXXUxDa3ObAwp64saSfSU2oXYtTOcVSjTvgFyUUmQt EVh5l1WCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMnDP-0000zd-K3; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:04:51 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMnDM-0000yQ-MG for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:04:49 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4E64368AFE; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:04:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:04:43 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] arm64: uaccess: remove set_fs() Message-ID: <20200928070443.GA15967@lst.de> References: <20200925160722.27155-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20200925160722.27155-12-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200925160722.27155-12-mark.rutland@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200928_030448_830687_60887982 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.84 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > +static inline void init_hw_uaccess_state(void) > { > + asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN)); > + asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_UAO(0), ARM64_HAS_UAO)); > } The way I read this code it is about per-task state, maybe that could be reflected in the name? init_task_hw_access_state or init_task_uaccess_flags? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel