From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] arm64: uaccess: remove addr_limit_user_check()
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:05:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200928070534.GB15967@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200925160722.27155-13-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 05:07:21PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Subsequent patches will remove addr_limit from arm64, consequently the
> addr_limit checks will become redundant. As a preparatory step, remove
> the checks and associated thread flag.
Wasn't this done in earlier patches? The only thing the next patch
does is to remove the PAN stuff. Maybe fold it into the patch
removing the addr_limit checking?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-25 16:07 [PATCH 00/13] arm64: remove set_fs() and friends Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 01/13] arm64: head.S: rename el2_setup -> init_kernel_el Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 02/13] arm64: head.S: cleanup SCTLR_ELx initialization Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 03/13] arm64: head.S: always initialize PSTATE Mark Rutland
2020-09-30 16:09 ` James Morse
2020-10-01 11:01 ` Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 04/13] arm64: sdei: move uaccess logic to arch/arm64/ Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 05/13] arm64: uaccess: move uao_* alternatives to asm-uaccess.h Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 06/13] arm64: uaccess: rename privileged uaccess routines Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 07/13] arm64: uaccess: simplify __copy_user_flushcache() Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 08/13] arm64: uaccess: refactor __{get,put}_user Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 09/13] arm64: uaccess: split user/kernel routines Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 10/13] arm64: uaccess cleanup macro naming Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 11/13] arm64: uaccess: remove set_fs() Mark Rutland
2020-09-28 7:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-28 9:02 ` Mark Rutland
2020-09-28 15:29 ` Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 12/13] arm64: uaccess: remove addr_limit_user_check() Mark Rutland
2020-09-28 7:05 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-09-28 9:06 ` Mark Rutland
2020-09-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 13/13] arm64: uaccess: remove redundant PAN toggling Mark Rutland
2020-09-28 7:16 ` [PATCH 00/13] arm64: remove set_fs() and friends Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-28 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-28 9:18 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200928070534.GB15967@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).