From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E750EC47423 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A6582311C for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="M+Yd4Rvk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8A6582311C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=7TM5DduGuL9LTfryCpGINVY6hD2FAz8UkgP6ODqo9hQ=; b=M+Yd4RvkKZ7S7ziTm1PE5AQWz 966zXSeC7sPy0zDTgTAzhEwa1x1NurcOQ2p8K+RfX2X0SYSN+VY5mNjcS6qXE7QkmLC0AA9iIKxea bxv8vt1+avfjiOUyaSNQojfU6ocK9lrxaPKQXimw/8uE7RrsgDPSe3Nmg3lfQ8ATRaQQMQwR/6N1C kyfr6m5IbJf4fWDoh2S/wiaZo4itvjhVZO7xwpd9nJVoojMcgsH7Kfswlm5y90QycAG4KBTsXxlnv Fw8/9jbUB/VD3GSL/ukeGAL2/5y6PAX5ncae0COKz52KhwkySWETChjjteat9XDqCsqk8Cb6DIV5z vhfvcRE+w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMnEA-0001BM-Gr; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:05:38 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMnE8-0001AY-AH for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:05:37 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A90B368AFE; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:05:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:05:34 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] arm64: uaccess: remove addr_limit_user_check() Message-ID: <20200928070534.GB15967@lst.de> References: <20200925160722.27155-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20200925160722.27155-13-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200925160722.27155-13-mark.rutland@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200928_030536_468250_1A2389B7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.49 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 05:07:21PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Subsequent patches will remove addr_limit from arm64, consequently the > addr_limit checks will become redundant. As a preparatory step, remove > the checks and associated thread flag. Wasn't this done in earlier patches? The only thing the next patch does is to remove the PAN stuff. Maybe fold it into the patch removing the addr_limit checking? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel