From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EE5C2D0A8 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E89121D7F for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="zqETn6o4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0E89121D7F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ClQBCN0ideLSMPFgI9kz7ohF1Q/J1/xbhzgd+/vOZcs=; b=zqETn6o4Qg5Wvyk6YJJLna3O6 zg/2zHK5ljAWTubFO5FDfLvXcaa9w+gRrjvab7zKnwxA+1ZgASV7H8tw9J9y4i18FC0sPKYXVMZDm sDsvUl1UQkVu25M06cA0ZbOf+ZT1xTtSidHP6JSo12QxwZAZ08hKHVQ9ttXLu9J4heFam2NwiDPMS gyfzu2yiLUuJzdKU4unDK12GBoKzbtzK40YX3d7NdHDTtN+THc2VCb2Hus55op0bfZISlqj7NJJhI /oAQs+0qLPVQW6vPBoLN3E37qmIwDTd1hAvQL8nSIro7eFkGlkF2R5g5pvabQekPQEBdwJFIA2tB9 Jcjcwx9Rw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMp7W-0003he-HH; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:06:54 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMp7R-0003hA-SB for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:06:50 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAEA101E; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 02:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from C02TD0UTHF1T.local (unknown [10.57.46.178]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6402E3F73B; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 02:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:06:44 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] arm64: uaccess: remove addr_limit_user_check() Message-ID: <20200928090644.GB30613@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> References: <20200925160722.27155-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20200925160722.27155-13-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20200928070534.GB15967@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200928070534.GB15967@lst.de> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200928_050649_987582_303D3ADB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:05:34AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 05:07:21PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Subsequent patches will remove addr_limit from arm64, consequently the > > addr_limit checks will become redundant. As a preparatory step, remove > > the checks and associated thread flag. > > Wasn't this done in earlier patches? The only thing the next patch > does is to remove the PAN stuff. Maybe fold it into the patch > removing the addr_limit checking? Ah, this is a rebase artifact from when the patches were the other way around. I'll update the commit message to not be misleading. Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel