From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20753C2D0A8 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8FB0206D9 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="flVoqjM5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C8FB0206D9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=+1+vLjD4V4fg1/hIcl2kg2n1rty7oFBOAqWtvj3lEBg=; b=flVoqjM5JrZGKcHEBtOjE78KL camja+He0P8XEHZVqejoClrtHwOeQFN/xXzj1XNeMLCZvVCcc2BYu1858rHaW5xiWt5Vgv2Vj+ZfN RG5uOXpgvBVBDUcZtEB7iDt0KLRuZ/Pf94PnO4uIpuEum6+8B2bexcfzk1WbFUOIyW6tAVMXEB21F KTAyKWSanB1vq/nGZ8K62k9jGjcK1pccrHPM2jUgJMdApbqRi2skLbAuu85KItV51rt1iNNkBKZKs mfpUyq7QejKb1MCLr2AbMBL3n7IlUBe0bRIUHVB09gAU6K0Vvmq478wxRLhBXnd7Syt6O94UwqZCs P0GTymdMQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMshX-0008S0-GF; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:56:19 +0000 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191] helo=huawei.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMshQ-0008Mm-Qu for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:56:14 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B09369B943540C5BB11D; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:56:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrphicprd00229.huawei.com (10.123.41.22) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:55:53 +0800 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , Lorenzo Pieralisi , , Ingo Molnar Subject: [PATCH v11 4/6] ACPI: HMAT: Fix handling of changes from ACPI 6.2 to ACPI 6.3 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:52:33 +0800 Message-ID: <20200928125235.446188-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20200928125235.446188-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20200928125235.446188-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.123.41.22] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200928_085613_154905_BC5A2B4F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.48 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, Borislav Petkov , Jonathan Cameron , Brice Goglin , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , Dan Williams , Sean V Kelley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org In ACPI 6.3, the Memory Proximity Domain Attributes Structure changed substantially. One of those changes was that the flag for "Memory Proximity Domain field is valid" was deprecated. This was because the field "Proximity Domain for the Memory" became a required field and hence having a validity flag makes no sense. So the correct logic is to always assume the field is there. Current code assumes it never is. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v11: No change drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c index 2c32cfb72370..6a91a55229ae 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c @@ -424,7 +424,8 @@ static int __init hmat_parse_proximity_domain(union acpi_subtable_headers *heade pr_info("HMAT: Memory Flags:%04x Processor Domain:%u Memory Domain:%u\n", p->flags, p->processor_PD, p->memory_PD); - if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID && hmat_revision == 1) { + if ((hmat_revision == 1 && p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID) || + hmat_revision > 1) { target = find_mem_target(p->memory_PD); if (!target) { pr_debug("HMAT: Memory Domain missing from SRAT\n"); -- 2.19.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel