From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971A0C4727E for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B732076B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Gy7CMEiX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 48B732076B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ihGCvVUVy+Fi4S8RhWdhUZYZpA4xOqsw/lb3INhQZJI=; b=Gy7CMEiXjELwpzqNxmRgpK2XG AtHi6YXAHwqR40QMtnTs2o6w8DpV+oyz5RtzmNjffsJNvGis+CPr92iBoosQL5RXaOM04kci8/20X 9x+Nl/i7xns8LPbVfgrmI8epq/cXMLP7pxUbvXcLS/c6Je7M4ES0h6pb53eRWSeppegnvcYD+KRj6 6TpkH/yRAVscAsAE916XuUW8j9qTcqJUgUOjZ+yoI2NiW/MeQV+fubWhCKpOOuJ6QEA8eyOIF70Hc ocDFkyzgSLa5hE1rmUinN4skZHTVMOH7ETxJNmKNx8KhEwgnPEjsNO3DjoK3LR8FZGpmhSNGvL8iy KTlbOxMTA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kNco7-00037U-5D; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:10:11 +0000 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190] helo=huawei.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kNco2-00032M-K0 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:10:08 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8B57B4ED18E9292FB188; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:09:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrphicprd00229.huawei.com (10.123.41.22) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:09:47 +0800 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , Lorenzo Pieralisi , , Ingo Molnar Subject: [PATCH v12 4/6] ACPI: HMAT: Fix handling of changes from ACPI 6.2 to ACPI 6.3 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:05:45 +0800 Message-ID: <20200930140547.840251-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20200930140547.840251-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20200930140547.840251-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.123.41.22] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200930_101006_922236_A600C1BF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.75 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, Borislav Petkov , Jonathan Cameron , Brice Goglin , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , Dan Williams , Sean V Kelley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org In ACPI 6.3, the Memory Proximity Domain Attributes Structure changed substantially. One of those changes was that the flag for "Memory Proximity Domain field is valid" was deprecated. This was because the field "Proximity Domain for the Memory" became a required field and hence having a validity flag makes no sense. So the correct logic is to always assume the field is there. Current code assumes it never is. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c index 2c32cfb72370..6a91a55229ae 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c @@ -424,7 +424,8 @@ static int __init hmat_parse_proximity_domain(union acpi_subtable_headers *heade pr_info("HMAT: Memory Flags:%04x Processor Domain:%u Memory Domain:%u\n", p->flags, p->processor_PD, p->memory_PD); - if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID && hmat_revision == 1) { + if ((hmat_revision == 1 && p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID) || + hmat_revision > 1) { target = find_mem_target(p->memory_PD); if (!target) { pr_debug("HMAT: Memory Domain missing from SRAT\n"); -- 2.19.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel