From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: permit ACPI core to map kernel memory used for table overrides
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:32:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930183259.00004582@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200929132522.18067-1-ardb@kernel.org>
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:25:22 +0200
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> Jonathan reports that the strict policy for memory mapped by the
> ACPI core breaks the use case of passing ACPI table overrides via
> initramfs. This is due to the fact that the memory type used for
> loading the initramfs in memory is not recognized as a memory type
> that is typically used by firmware to pass firmware tables.
>
> Since the purpose of the strict policy is to ensure that no AML or
> other ACPI code can manipulate any memory that is used by the kernel
> to keep its internal state or the state of user tasks, we can relax
> the permission check, and allow mappings of memory that is reserved
> and marked as NOMAP via memblock, and therefore not covered by the
> linear mapping to begin with.
>
My over enthusiastic filters went and swept this one away so I missed it.
Catalin, thanks for pointing it out!
Anyhow, retested and still looks good. Slightly tighter check makes
sense.
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Fixes: 1583052d111f ("arm64/acpi: disallow AML memory opregions to access kernel memory")
> Fixes: 325f5585ec36 ("arm64/acpi: disallow writeable AML opregion mapping for EFI code regions")
> Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/acpi.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> index a85174d05473..cada0b816c8a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -298,8 +298,21 @@ void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
> case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA:
> case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY:
> case EFI_PERSISTENT_MEMORY:
> - pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers kernel memory @ %pa\n", &phys);
> - return NULL;
> + if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys) ||
> + !memblock_is_region_memory(phys, size)) {
> + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers kernel memory @ %pa\n", &phys);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + /*
> + * Mapping kernel memory is permitted if the region in
> + * question is covered by a single memblock with the
> + * NOMAP attribute set: this enables the use of ACPI
> + * table overrides passed via initramfs, which are
> + * reserved in memory using arch_reserve_mem_area()
> + * below. As this particular use case only requires
> + * read access, fall through to the R/O mapping case.
> + */
> + fallthrough;
>
> case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE:
> /*
> @@ -388,3 +401,8 @@ int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> return err;
> }
> +
> +void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, size_t size)
> +{
> + memblock_mark_nomap(addr, size);
> +}
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 1e4cdc6c7ae2..64ae25c59d55 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ void acpi_os_set_prepare_extended_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state,
> acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_extended_sleep(u8 sleep_state,
> u32 val_a, u32 val_b);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> +#ifndef CONFIG_IA64
> void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, size_t size);
> #else
> static inline void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr,
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-30 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 13:25 [PATCH] arm64: permit ACPI core to map kernel memory used for table overrides Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-30 17:32 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200930183259.00004582@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).