From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE6DC433DF for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 21:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3E7C22203 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 21:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Ru033CSr" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A3E7C22203 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=yjOdCIlagHxoaX0hR4YsXPAc3k3uBRsLV+ZoamroSqA=; b=Ru033CSrdg1jcSyGp6hK65CN5 i7SqOcfZhM5nfa3m4RXxMfvntWrYawj9gI3xqgIEaqfvck6SwnVEStC5ZNGt+6MupeikqYbJKNGZd AUz9HYeczMF79q0e6RdUpIgLpKC8PWOHBkluyLDsXjPEXAMJURXkGgaZ4br47AfMD+wEGoQCYDlGk uhl+q/GVxWklwtbzlMBLHvwY1hVGaI9Hcip9ORIrFOi4Gyk2TAvVqwBqEXsq5XmtCUsoElG2Maxe+ 560Ior6qSOx0ZmtAFHrDW0+HBQXJPkrKeUs9K4fcaU4PrgThA7hDZSLIlmwYTlQyvhngfWvDOlBQn HOHC7UxrA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kQd9e-0003d4-2d; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 21:08:50 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kQd9a-0003cj-Or for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 21:08:47 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CB71063; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.53.233]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF7263F66B; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 22:08:39 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Etienne Carriere Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] firmware: arm_scmi: add config dependency for smc transport Message-ID: <20201008210839.6nnl2tvm2re2ckvu@bogus> References: <20201008143722.21888-1-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> <20201008143722.21888-3-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201008143722.21888-3-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201008_170846_855622_D2A6833E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.49 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Souvik Chakravarty , Vincent Guittot , Cristian Marussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:37:20PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote: > Fix dependencies for configuration switch ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL that > is not exclusively dependent on MAILBOX since the alternate > smc transport that is depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY since [1]. > Do you need any build issues ? I don't see why this is needed. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel