From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80977C433E7 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 21:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 133DB22200 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 21:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="lG41+4Po" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 133DB22200 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=e0HNTWFOT4Or9K+TPr5oIycgGmsXkkxhe+7cw5h3SvA=; b=lG41+4PodG00JD3H3Ts7p7GND aUNkry7JBHo0K358Ow0EzxtAoud1PVNIZlWoFxnh50GcyFoxZyAB0L608eaheUReCNq055FNaPP7v q/fTfSqmmfUoM1aXwuo45XgURKKfzlL0qprk3i3HEFB0cJFuhH90NCuMZqnoDjsZJNWi9tRBKH9Gl IiJppcjFkcWpOWmVycEPSv/Uz9lGsZfUFeq+R3fdWwkkZeYzJtbWE66Nf0olbb9Xg1Q9842jMSdRS DUZ6nbSNHzSUIgtFv97ts4CWixyj/pX4ZV81AKh17uAHnLM6PclWQnjoww2US7D97r4uTTgSujnVg Q+wmiKWCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kQdIj-0004Rm-A0; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 21:18:13 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kQdIh-0004R1-6q for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 21:18:12 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F4D1063; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.53.233]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E19B3F66B; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 22:18:04 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Etienne Carriere Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] firmware: arm_scmi: fix transfer missing re-initialization Message-ID: <20201008211804.soegjqsvmsgfmcne@bogus> References: <20201008143722.21888-1-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> <20201008143722.21888-2-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201008143722.21888-2-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201008_171811_351958_107D807B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.60 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Souvik Chakravarty , Vincent Guittot , Cristian Marussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:37:19PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote: > Implement helper function scmi_do_xfer_again() to process consecutive > transfers that are initialized only once with scmi_xfer_get_init() > and hence get the pool completion and responses message length not > reloaded regarding last completed transfer. > > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere > --- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c | 2 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 2 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 2 ++ > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 10 ++++++++++ > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 2 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 2 +- > 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c > index 9853bd3c4d45..508f214baa1b 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int scmi_base_implementation_list_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, > /* Set the number of protocols to be skipped/already read */ > *num_skip = cpu_to_le32(tot_num_ret); > > - ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t); > + ret = scmi_do_xfer_again(handle, t); > if (ret) > break; > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > index c1cfe3ee3d55..9bb54c1a8d55 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id, > /* Set the number of rates to be skipped/already read */ > clk_desc->rate_index = cpu_to_le32(tot_rate_cnt); > > - ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t); > + ret = scmi_do_xfer_again(handle, t); > if (ret) > goto err; > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h > index 37fb583f1bf5..6d4eea7b0f3e 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h > @@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ struct scmi_xfer { > > void scmi_xfer_put(const struct scmi_handle *h, struct scmi_xfer *xfer); > int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *h, struct scmi_xfer *xfer); > +int scmi_do_xfer_again(const struct scmi_handle *handle, > + struct scmi_xfer *xfer); > int scmi_do_xfer_with_response(const struct scmi_handle *h, > struct scmi_xfer *xfer); > int scmi_xfer_get_init(const struct scmi_handle *h, u8 msg_id, u8 prot_id, > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > index c5dea87edf8f..887cb8249db0 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > @@ -402,6 +402,16 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) > return ret; > } > > +int scmi_do_xfer_again(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) > +{ > + struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle); > + > + xfer->rx.len = info->desc->max_msg_size; I am tempted to just have helper for above and use it where needed. Or may be I just don't like the name of the function, how about scmi_do_xfer_rxlen_reinit or anything else. Suggestions ? > + xfer->hdr.poll_completion = false; Do we really need the above ? -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel