From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA6BC433DF for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E151222BA for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Y3kyj3C1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3E151222BA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=UQk3RzxjeeSh27ehIYQ9dTKX6W1SMV8mARG8MDoE0OA=; b=Y3kyj3C1uYBlgTFs+yMnZz4BF ryX6r+QsVazBcYuqiqtyHLnMRKzBrAgh3IeKeipmKSdE2ZGybHI7angrKTIG5RhRLmF0B0PV9ogNP 4kQIPmtwRJJSqZn+ugKZXRvzStNBplbNm/s8vUUMpLDgN5Dn1/MPrhPe2G3HXoLKUqauKqtHiUCo+ jcjYtktE6PzCC7VZSLwc/KuKFyhkLA39XuDqtFzj/KcJ+QG1uRz+NLMy4Sf0csPTWlb5f1SA4SLVX rwC2kbIhzU61hhP/pX5NZAX60SZvVelHZ2P9t+SwI+/RR8adV2vNimwj7olKF0X/wJus+NJ3utw32 Tjc0zcF8w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kQumq-0000YB-TJ; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:58:28 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kQumo-0000Xf-F5 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:58:27 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB67D6E; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 08:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.53.233]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C96EA3F66B; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 08:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:58:16 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Etienne Carriere Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] firmware: arm_scmi: add config dependency for smc transport Message-ID: <20201009155816.il56rbatvcagyosz@bogus> References: <20201008143722.21888-1-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> <20201008143722.21888-3-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> <20201008210839.6nnl2tvm2re2ckvu@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201009_115826_559018_48CA698A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.04 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Souvik Chakravarty , Vincent Guittot , Cristian Marussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 02:33:41PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote: > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 23:08, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:37:20PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote: > > > Fix dependencies for configuration switch ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL that > > > is not exclusively dependent on MAILBOX since the alternate > > > smc transport that is depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY since [1]. > > > > > > > Do you need any build issues ? I don't see why this is needed. > > > > This change is for consistency of the kernel configuration. > Without this change, a kernel configured without CONFIG_MAILBOX > cannot embed SCMI support even is using only the SMC transport > enabled thanks to HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY. > Fair enough, however instead of adding to the list for each added transport we need to do better transport abstraction now that we have multiple. I don't see this as critical, let me know if you disagree. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel