From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB5EC433E7 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 707BE2224D for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="xMDmTBGW"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="CcFt0Pm9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 707BE2224D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=T/U6oqg/sTWPNMHi/aP/zdNJCbR5RRQ2vO0KlJH1DBs=; b=xMDmTBGWsTtfR/6A3YeWbVcSf nh/HuQ+8360qXRaBX+L/yH/RXhoAaFuKqGkOxz/0jwWl+itfgQrJGPNyO9GrXQiUTcNQGIMZReLEo ohIthAosSahQ0XOfSR1WSFU8NdDxXFtSW4mYNRVp9HPkK3MEilpMclHsAelyryfWZnAfgBaA0vNUu n01OoxlAlX64jXdE2QHdFm/6zSz8a1mnTt575hUN1V0bcal73+tRr90FbRv6Rc6a1lStUvBE+KZ6u ns1OGbETWOB/iKtaIOhTRzBaQz41uYlbd59y4aElsVYY4Nb7YjvjFGZsYSoYOTFEsLKm5/DHLoKjA Sml9fyZjg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kUZGs-0004sf-KP; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:48:34 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-x1042.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1042]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kUZGp-0004pt-2z for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:48:32 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-x1042.google.com with SMTP id g16so169426pjv.3 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:48:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Dso7M3xII/d9TKbRCRuszeJJswC1SL7FTDyN4dGwTeo=; b=CcFt0Pm9mjjVEQ7mkd4yCYWpK9UuRSpK/ijbWer/u18VicXWAzXN8uOKKepO6mSiWg dl4kNqKrIpENjIttY26O6QQ3pk7Qv3rIMfKunOqaSxEK/+Mad9Pf3mBziVN6jqjr525N 0MEi/M5JZFFOZGw1HRw8yjKhgbvhEHdABHMsyuw/88QNCTDe/DLDnl3o9T42ZDnTZyV+ AXVS7bq6dhmY1oNUzbCumllcEgbervieVv2+0Gv7N0crTg1vSP3JeFFjln3XSmZREiM/ TBFg12toP1BM7DznumODy6jZR45zDLYBrhF4Xz4+gcnaRJ1ar3U2W3mbbhMCyPDZ4uFU Ed4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Dso7M3xII/d9TKbRCRuszeJJswC1SL7FTDyN4dGwTeo=; b=TL+pQ1TkNxmGSATJOTDorGDQajuD2/JEo3DUuCLxVo2IDSOAMxlGeozHq/bFPG1Pbf nXpsJikr60ATMUbeqlT7lB28BOFgzZ8KnSUKNKyYRyojAvCtgZC0txFFEfPH6MBVV45B GI/GD5t/Kj229l/4Y2v9UEtCaU3zpgmctemrUgJnzJSUqZymaCf/QhU9OTUCfQBw770q E8NFz44wCLOMSSBuHTpfIVfRdXCBDcjVqrZdnkKcSy1vksAzQUHmxNqWzIGuu0XNYE2y e8nEHERBHoEIZDaHuHiwHXoe857BD2MEY6GfJvAp7PCxs3YcBFF5s2YLRQ1ofhoLATon cs0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530fDrAX8F+8h52931QhUMwBewCQ0aaCEjH71yQgFNNWCShkR1Vp kVY+xNCAETb6YbzfaTv/n7wiqA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGOjlveq0QvBQshUJ3ZRbENBe+0PU1D2L6KI4JoW1bo3CSLcSYGypzIiOaerFdzfE632l6UQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8f82:b029:d4:bf4f:13da with SMTP id z2-20020a1709028f82b02900d4bf4f13damr921208plo.40.1603129708929; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 (S0106002369de4dac.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.8.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z28sm407957pfk.213.2020.10.19.10.48.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:48:26 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Peng Fan Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX specific parse fw hook Message-ID: <20201019174826.GC496175@xps15> References: <20200927064131.24101-1-peng.fan@nxp.com> <20200927064131.24101-6-peng.fan@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200927064131.24101-6-peng.fan@nxp.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201019_134831_573469_9030696D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.05 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Richard Zhu , festevam@gmail.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, o.rempel@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, kernel@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 02:41:29PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > The hook is used to parse memory-regions and load resource table > from the address the remote processor published. > > Reviewed-by: Richard Zhu > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > --- > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > index 48ce09e857ee..bd3a42892b22 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -243,10 +244,106 @@ static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) > return va; > } > > +static int imx_rproc_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > +{ > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; > + void *va; > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "map memory: %p+%zx\n", &mem->dma, mem->len); > + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) { > + dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %p+%zx\n", > + &mem->dma, mem->len); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + /* Update memory entry va */ > + mem->va = va; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int imx_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > +{ > + dev_dbg(rproc->dev.parent, "unmap memory: %pa\n", &mem->dma); > + iounmap(mem->va); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int imx_rproc_parse_memory_regions(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv; > + struct device_node *np = priv->dev->of_node; > + struct of_phandle_iterator it; > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > + struct reserved_mem *rmem; > + int index = 0; > + u32 da; > + > + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */ > + of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, np, "memory-region", NULL, 0); > + while (of_phandle_iterator_next(&it) == 0) { > + /* > + * Ignore the first memory region which will be used vdev buffer. > + * No need to do extra handlings, rproc_add_virtio_dev will handle it. > + */ > + if (!index && !strcmp(it.node->name, "vdevbuffer")) { > + index ++; How many vdevs is there in your scenario? Since most of this code is taken from stm32 anyway I would suggest to use "vdev0buffer" and get rid of the "index ++". It adds needless complexity and doesn't pass the checkpatch test. With the above: Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier > + continue; > + } > + > + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node); > + if (!rmem) { > + dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* No need to translate pa to da, i.MX use same map */ > + da = rmem->base; > + > + /* Register memory region */ > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(priv->dev, NULL, (dma_addr_t)rmem->base, rmem->size, da, > + imx_rproc_mem_alloc, imx_rproc_mem_release, > + it.node->name); > + > + if (mem) > + rproc_coredump_add_segment(rproc, da, rmem->size); > + else > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > + index++; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int imx_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > +{ > + int ret = imx_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc); > + > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw); > + if (ret) > + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "No resource table in elf\n"); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = { > .start = imx_rproc_start, > .stop = imx_rproc_stop, > .da_to_va = imx_rproc_da_to_va, > + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > + .parse_fw = imx_rproc_parse_fw, > + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, > + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, > + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, > }; > > static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv, > -- > 2.28.0 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel