From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255CBC388F9 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C69A2224E for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="2t+2SSCN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7C69A2224E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=fmuFKlnr3zQUBrdNsxyf93WDZENKWdakae8CSyf1Fa0=; b=2t+2SSCNV3u+pAcm/pl5TUQtz Fi1SQ0HjBqkD00zCcUZ010afJV+QNGXe75tNFXfEdGRWpfRb2vZrgQSKZBSEsjK2aHsEfhYi+dUkh ThJDsAy22Ek9CvW7s5A3bPDs89nDO9Tn+W0qZNtRNjNm8C0oVifCDlc5gg9ZzT9s5BqdnxQfZ4egR dkqu/atE2kufVAfbMNekp1cYAur6nzigG1nXTf6uStpED2sS0iwLnVV0tYb8LlZNQ5Ww8Dio8nl7H t0HoctzlKHEPO1eaU2bfLr/RUdmMp3IW+L9BTfUUsk0HL2KUWM02hStERHYFt3EA146ePBuEHJ+Nx c8X7DMCqg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kVFCz-0005Y1-Qj; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:35:21 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kVFCx-0005X5-D2 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:35:20 +0000 Received: from gaia (unknown [95.145.162.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D32512224E; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:35:13 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for Asymmetric AArch32 systems Message-ID: <20201021143513.GE3976@gaia> References: <20201021104611.2744565-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> <20201021112656.GB1141598@kroah.com> <20201021131504.vc3nbf2vt5dtiuva@e107158-lin> <20201021133105.GA1164216@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201021133105.GA1164216@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201021_103519_532121_08583AB4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , "Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" , Marc Zyngier , Morten Rasmussen , James Morse , Linus Torvalds , Qais Yousef , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 03:31:05PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 02:15:04PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote: > > > Without even looking at the patch set, this is not ok... > > > > Sorry about that. Please keep in mind we're still debating if we want to > > support this upstream. > > What do you mean by this? > > Do you mean you will keep an out-of-tree patchset for all time for all > future kernel versions for everyone to pull from and you will support > for all chips that end up with this type of functionality? > > That's a huge task to do, you all must have a lot of money to burn! >From a maintainer perspective (and not as an Arm employee), hopefully the high cost would be a deterrent to other such hardware combinations in the future ;). Even if it will (likely) end up in mainline, we shouldn't make it straightforward. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel