From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CC1C4363A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D82D32463C for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="VfkLsq1t" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D82D32463C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To: From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=67muEkZjfc71F0o2yl6Jz0iso72nqDRZRjX9VCcFWVo=; b=VfkLsq1tWijqv6EgT0juEuVCV3 cn2H4zDgxTSPsawxMcuh/VEIEbh480pPhSjAl7Q9yWubhHdRj4ZZOYETptOG2zXsErfzAhm0LKl/e FwR0deM74oxtXvKtOF+nPuTHsmyIjmfIHBY4rH3hwbjYNLd6CqZvkRyajV84iev86gzd7iJTucMI6 tWD1hvWlOrfYpde4nx1Qb5icOBcRKQyY8tla96LBWGYB8RdGiuHDGKZdiVUyGYPReaX1/FpGVpydY hh4YDJoZ64Xu0Jz57c5EzHP3CEuGAVRNtxc11BrYsR9HrSswsAOHRLmXHiVfTabWKE4O9eg+k7bqi Uh4uJYgw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kX2uI-00072H-1q; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:51:30 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kX2sb-0006Fx-29 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:49:49 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA1F1042; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 06:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D6B573F68F; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 06:49:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Rutland To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCHv2 2/3] arm64: cpufeature: reorder cpus_have_{const, final}_cap() Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:49:30 +0000 Message-Id: <20201026134931.28246-3-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20201026134931.28246-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> References: <20201026134931.28246-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201026_094945_348358_1A9F34E2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, dbrazdil@google.com, will@kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org In a subsequent patch we'll modify cpus_have_const_cap() to call cpus_have_final_cap(), and hence we need to define cpus_have_final_cap() first. To make subsequent changes easier to follow, this patch reorders the two without making any other changes. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: David Brazdil Cc: Marc Zyngier Cc: Will Deacon --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index f7e7144af174c..5d18c54507e6a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -428,35 +428,35 @@ static __always_inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num) } /* - * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check. + * Test for a capability without a runtime check. * - * Before capabilities are finalized, this behaves as cpus_have_cap(). + * Before capabilities are finalized, this will BUG(). * After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check. * * @num must be a compile-time constant. */ -static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num) +static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num) { if (system_capabilities_finalized()) return __cpus_have_const_cap(num); else - return cpus_have_cap(num); + BUG(); } /* - * Test for a capability without a runtime check. + * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check. * - * Before capabilities are finalized, this will BUG(). + * Before capabilities are finalized, this behaves as cpus_have_cap(). * After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check. * * @num must be a compile-time constant. */ -static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num) +static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num) { if (system_capabilities_finalized()) return __cpus_have_const_cap(num); else - BUG(); + return cpus_have_cap(num); } static inline void cpus_set_cap(unsigned int num) -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel