From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix early single-stepping
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:59:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201027115909.GB1514990@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201027194258.43b157ac0bbccd918fc8756a@kernel.org>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:42:58PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:13:18 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:29:09 +0100
> > Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > > To use debug features such as single-step, the OS lock must be unlocked
> > > in the debug registers. Currently this is done in postcore_initcall
> > > which is now too late.
> > >
> > > Commit 36dadef23fcc ("kprobes: Init kprobes in early_initcall") enabled
> > > using kprobes from early_initcall, when OS lock is still locked. So when
> > > kprobe attempts to single-step a patched instruction, instead of
> > > trapping, execution continues until it throws an undef exception:
> > >
> > > [ 0.064233] Kprobe smoke test: started
> > > [ 0.151133] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [ 0.151458] kernel BUG at arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:406!
> > > [ 0.151812] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > > ...
> > > [ 0.162689] Call trace:
> > > [ 0.163014] do_undefinstr+0x1d4/0x1f4
> > > [ 0.163336] el1_sync_handler+0xbc/0x140
> > > [ 0.163839] el1_sync+0x80/0x100
> > > [ 0.164154] 0xffffffc01001d004
> > > [ 0.164527] init_kprobes+0x13c/0x154
> > > [ 0.164968] do_one_initcall+0x54/0x2e0
> > > [ 0.165322] kernel_init_freeable+0xf4/0x258
> > > [ 0.165783] kernel_init+0x20/0x12c
> > > [ 0.166117] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30
> > > [ 0.166595] Code: 97ffff53 a9425bf5 17ffff9b f9001bf7 (d4210000)
> > > [ 0.167084] ---[ end trace 36778fdf576e9a79 ]---
> > >
> > > To fix this, unlock the OS lock as early as possible. Do it in
> > > traps_init() for CPU0, since KGDB wants to use single-step from that
> > > point on according to commit b322c65f8ca3 ("arm64: Call
> > > debug_traps_init() from trap_init() to help early kgdb").
> > > For secondary CPUs, setup the CPU hotplug handler at early_initcall.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 36dadef23fcc ("kprobes: Init kprobes in early_initcall")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> >
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > How have you confirmed this fixes the issue?
> > On my environment, this doesn't fix the issue.
>
> Oops, it was my mistake. I missed to boot up with Xen. (so I find another bug...)
> Anyway this works for me too.
No worries :) Although now I've been wondering whether it would be better
to just disable the OS lock lazily, on the first call to
enable_debug_monitors(). It might add a tiny performance penalty but would
avoid this problem reappearing if one of the debugger needs to start even
earlier in the future.
> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Jean
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-27 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-26 17:29 [PATCH] arm64: Fix early single-stepping Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-10-26 17:38 ` Will Deacon
2020-10-27 0:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-10-27 10:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-10-27 10:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-10-27 11:59 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2020-10-27 12:33 ` Will Deacon
2020-10-27 13:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-10-28 8:28 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-10-28 8:36 ` Will Deacon
2020-10-28 9:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-10-28 9:48 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-10-28 12:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-25 16:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-25 16:11 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-25 16:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201027115909.GB1514990@myrica \
--to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox