From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58012C388F2 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC4202231B for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="f30M71hH"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="vGSl9SXi" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DC4202231B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=PmGRtK7b6geFPzpyHeyRhjGHXuIY3TI4/rDfQeJ/7u0=; b=f30M71hH6NBzDkSsAeUW6gFt+ kkynW34pj1SrXPqQ5S2rcsBqok4xR3T04KDlePp+Jc2fe4I2jG6WOra9ADjD/PA4Y/Y3WBZepvEev 18GHHhCGCZv97z9iTr0FddC7ptKoSTjt78trAjx8jJ4NhjywoagtUx5i/nKnjxwPIQ7lvyiMd3rw3 KZiIzgsgHi+RQS668ZQI55oDBV4PueZL8D4ZiAVfIPmAk+jhvpimJP02fJiMie6OIbIEAtbKLHLFa 2kRhGGLy5SsBxLLkMpCv3ncIzohu8dpbhSmYSWZU0VexlBtYb6eSx2cFYkHruJk+Kek1iVuoFtpeE NwozzagfQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kZaIT-00053V-7D; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 13:54:57 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kZaIR-00052y-06 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 13:54:55 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id h62so4761098wme.3 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 05:54:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HSJ3s4kk78CsixfcMhylaTOQInqHbcM0PNqhAJpk4PE=; b=vGSl9SXiVHPlEeKwXPuJ+kqLGdcCNTo32UXEgPV6SG/4765tTSjI2XccTyhH463SR9 X8WdheAFoGwThNeBZ/iHvH5rD8CKfQZbkTllsKe5hmGcTsSKZ1yqK57hdfh97SRSfc2S xTxOI7YThT0jVW3jA6wkBMGHVOI8vDSDeb0hajPli/tuYw6YzIJPiJfaqpCoyeWdYneJ /UFXt5emdxCPw06+vrb2w+8vcWCDBRx6K1PV2u6VXX+8PSHF99vME9IXJFAWQTlvzr6a /SA1CC+mqWKfImAXziaKUIgIBbhQu0ACrv27R8d/dPBohYxxHFWfmOSIJFs5toRcfga9 KXbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HSJ3s4kk78CsixfcMhylaTOQInqHbcM0PNqhAJpk4PE=; b=rXAirTsrqlAU4+B9kGaIjrIGL/z/HOatiNaUNBJ+hG0l/pwpuLsGKDKhDcie+Ige8s qEfMIzMzSXAG4LKx8x9MqCkLE2jE6gh42GsmQEEpSYcgSwVVNUXBjAeOcFZqXy9zjCP3 uhF2Xi1aQg5RxNahFPM79xq0H5LPl6hA4WrP4DemVuF/IKQjOjlkOAJj0g4zJpgrJLq6 d9mFLrZtj6hz9I/+HDxnetktQhitRpVaZ8GkoPFO9qWnsBEQQ5aLVPkdw1pChMuRWQu6 vCwPHLbtFhe7l8W3T2qEsHe1AUzleI6s0+LdIujkS2LijBMFrT4ah8fbztvWXue58Wb4 KNwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530o/B7oTPH5A4rpxzTFy/gYrPWepeieEC8cGO/IHM3pTQQRsr87 tYmgYGm5OSJk7bE40PGct2IMSg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8/+oUahdkx2/ilxjGC/UEmOEiYmXb73w90eteOw4p5SnvEC4gSXTCGgVhR0HS7Cxwj0r2WA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6a0d:: with SMTP id f13mr3686427wmc.172.1604325293729; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 05:54:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2a00:79e0:d:210:f693:9fff:fef4:a7ef]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r18sm24511552wrj.50.2020.11.02.05.54.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Nov 2020 05:54:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:54:49 +0000 From: Quentin Perret To: Lukasz Luba Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Clarify abstract scale usage for power values in Energy Model, EAS and IPA Message-ID: <20201102135449.GE2221764@google.com> References: <20201019140601.3047-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201102_085455_076036_E91F853D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.61 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dianders@chromium.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com, amitk@kernel.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org, mka@chromium.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Monday 02 Nov 2020 at 08:54:38 (+0000), Lukasz Luba wrote: > Gentle ping to Quentin and Daniel for sharing opinion on this patch set. > If you are OK, then I could use this as a base for next work. One or two small nits, but overall this LGTM. Thanks Lukasz. > As you probably know I am working also on 'sustainable power' estimation > which could be used when there is no DT value but it comes from FW. > That would meet requirement from Doug, when the DT cannot be used, > but we have sustainable levels from FW [1]. Cool, and also, I'd be happy to hear from Doug if passing the sustained power via sysfs is good enough for his use-case in the meantime? Thanks, Quentin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel