linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: kprobes: Remove redundant kprobe_step_ctx
Date: Tue,  3 Nov 2020 14:49:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201103134900.337243-2-jean-philippe@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201103134900.337243-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org>

From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

The kprobe_step_ctx (kcb->ss_ctx) has ss_pending and match_addr, but
those are redundant because those can be replaced by KPROBE_HIT_SS and
&cur_kprobe->ainsn.api.insn[1] respectively.
To simplify the code, remove the kprobe_step_ctx.

Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h   |  7 ----
 arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 53 +++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
index 8699ce30f587..5d38ff4a4806 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -28,18 +28,11 @@ struct prev_kprobe {
 	unsigned int status;
 };
 
-/* Single step context for kprobe */
-struct kprobe_step_ctx {
-	unsigned long ss_pending;
-	unsigned long match_addr;
-};
-
 /* per-cpu kprobe control block */
 struct kprobe_ctlblk {
 	unsigned int kprobe_status;
 	unsigned long saved_irqflag;
 	struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
-	struct kprobe_step_ctx ss_ctx;
 };
 
 void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
index f11a1a1f7026..89c64ada8732 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
 
 static void __kprobes
-post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe_ctlblk *, struct pt_regs *);
+post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe *, struct kprobe_ctlblk *, struct pt_regs *);
 
 static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
 {
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static void __kprobes arch_simulate_insn(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		p->ainsn.api.handler((u32)p->opcode, (long)p->addr, regs);
 
 	/* single step simulated, now go for post processing */
-	post_kprobe_handler(kcb, regs);
+	post_kprobe_handler(p, kcb, regs);
 }
 
 int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
@@ -177,19 +177,6 @@ static void __kprobes kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb,
 	regs->pstate |= kcb->saved_irqflag;
 }
 
-static void __kprobes
-set_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
-{
-	kcb->ss_ctx.ss_pending = true;
-	kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = addr + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
-}
-
-static void __kprobes clear_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
-{
-	kcb->ss_ctx.ss_pending = false;
-	kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = 0;
-}
-
 static void __kprobes setup_singlestep(struct kprobe *p,
 				       struct pt_regs *regs,
 				       struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, int reenter)
@@ -209,7 +196,6 @@ static void __kprobes setup_singlestep(struct kprobe *p,
 		/* prepare for single stepping */
 		slot = (unsigned long)p->ainsn.api.insn;
 
-		set_ss_context(kcb, slot);	/* mark pending ss */
 		kprobes_save_local_irqflag(kcb, regs);
 		instruction_pointer_set(regs, slot);
 	} else {
@@ -243,13 +229,8 @@ static int __kprobes reenter_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
 }
 
 static void __kprobes
-post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
+post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe *cur, struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
-
-	if (!cur)
-		return;
-
 	/* return addr restore if non-branching insn */
 	if (cur->ainsn.api.restore != 0)
 		instruction_pointer_set(regs, cur->ainsn.api.restore);
@@ -364,33 +345,23 @@ static void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 */
 }
 
-static int __kprobes
-kprobe_ss_hit(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
-{
-	if ((kcb->ss_ctx.ss_pending)
-	    && (kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr == addr)) {
-		clear_ss_context(kcb);	/* clear pending ss */
-		return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
-	}
-	/* not ours, kprobes should ignore it */
-	return DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
-}
-
 static int __kprobes
 kprobe_breakpoint_ss_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
 {
 	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
-	int retval;
-
-	/* return error if this is not our step */
-	retval = kprobe_ss_hit(kcb, instruction_pointer(regs));
+	unsigned long addr = instruction_pointer(regs);
+	struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
 
-	if (retval == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
+	if (cur && (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS)
+	    && ((unsigned long)&cur->ainsn.api.insn[1] == addr)) {
 		kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(kcb, regs);
-		post_kprobe_handler(kcb, regs);
+		post_kprobe_handler(cur, kcb, regs);
+
+		return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
 	}
 
-	return retval;
+	/* not ours, kprobes should ignore it */
+	return DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
 }
 
 static struct break_hook kprobes_break_ss_hook = {
-- 
2.29.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-03 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-03 13:49 [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: kprobes: Use BRK instead of single-step when executing instructions out-of-line Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-11-03 13:49 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2020-11-03 15:01   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: kprobes: Remove redundant kprobe_step_ctx Will Deacon
2020-11-10 19:24     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-03 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: kprobes: Use BRK instead of single-step when executing instructions out-of-line Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201103134900.337243-2-jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).